Supreme court lifts restrictions on Los Angeles immigration raids in win for Trump | US supreme court

Federal agents can resume radical immigration operations in Los Angeles after the United States Supreme Court has raised an order prohibiting the Donald Trump administration from preventing people only according to their race, language or work.

The court ruled in favor of the Trump administration, granting a suspension against an order for the ban on another judge who found that the “itinerant patrols” of immigration agents put blind arrests in Los Angeles. The decision of the conservative majority is a victory for administration in its continuous effort to adopt mass deportations.

The American district judge Maame E Frimpong in Los Angeles had found a “mountain of evidence” that the application tactics violated the Constitution. The complainants,, Who said that the administration’s approach was equivalent to a “flagrant racial profiling”, said American citizens swept away in immigration judgments. A court of appeal had left Frimpong’s decision in place.

But the Trump administration argued that the properly restricted order ordering making its generalized repression against illegal immigration.

The Supreme Court 6-3 Decision 6-3 comes while immigration and customs’ application agents (ICE) also intensify the application of the law in Washington in the middle of the unprecedented federal redemption of the capital’s application and the deployment of the National Guard. Meanwhile, Chicago is preparing for an immigration operation expected this week and the possible deployment of the National Guard after weeks of threats.

Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, condemned the decision, writing that the administration aims at Latinos and that “Trump’s private police forces now have a green light to come after your family.”

Aclu in southern California called him “devastating reverse”.

“By running before the Supreme Court to request this stay, the government has clearly indicated that its application of application in southern California is motivated by the race,” Mohammad Tajsar, a principal lawyer of the ACLU of South California, in a statement. “We will continue to combat the administration’s racist expulsion program to guarantee that each person living in southern California – without any race or status – is sure.”

The Trump administration celebrated the decision with Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, describing him as a “massive victory”.

“Now, ice can continue to perform itinerant patrols in California without legal microestion,” she said.

The trial will now continue to take place in California. It was deposited by ACLU defense groups and immigrants who accused Trump administration of having systematically targeted people with brown skin during a repression of illegal immigration to the Los Angeles region.

The Trump administration has made California a center of its expulsion campaign, sending federal agents near schools and workplaces and Home Depot stores. The great spectacle of federal agents – as well as the deployment of soldiers – left the communities of southern California in fear.

In his order granting the suspension, the majority of the court wrote that the government sometimes makes judgments to verify the immigration status of people who occupy jobs in landscaping or construction, among others “who often do not require paperwork and are therefore attractive for illegal immigrants; And who do not speak much English ”.

“Immigration judgments based on reasonable suspicions of illegal presence have been an important component of the application of American immigration for decades, in several presidential administrations,” said the decision.

In a spicy dissent joined by her two liberal colleagues, judge Sonia Sotomayor wrote: “Innumerable people in the Los Angeles region have been seized, thrown to the ground and handcuffed simply because of their appearance, their accents and the fact that they earn their lives by doing manual work. Today, unnecessary court subjects are innumerable more than the same unworthiness. “

The lawyers of the Ministry of Internal Security said that immigration agents target people according to the illegal presence in the United States, not the color of the skin, the race or the ethnicity. Nevertheless, the Ministry of Justice argued that the order wrongly restricts the factors that ICE agents can use to decide who stop.

The Los Angeles region was a battlefield for the Trump administration after its hard immigration strategy stimulated the protests and the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines. The number of immigration raids in the Los Angeles region seemed to slow down shortly after the Order of Frimpong fell in July, but recently, they have become more frequent again, including an operation in which the agents jumped from the rear of a rented box truck and arrested in a store in the Home Depot.

The decision of the Supreme Court was sentenced by the mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass, who said that “it was not only an attack on the inhabitants of Los Angeles, it is an attack on each person in each city in this country.

“I want the whole nation to hear me when I say that it is not only an attack on the inhabitants of Los Angeles, it is an attack on each person in each city in this country. Today’s decision is not only dangerous – it is non -American and threatens the fabric of personal freedom in the United States of America. ”

The complainants argued that the Frimpong order only prevents federal agents from stopping without reasonable suspicion, which aligned with the Constitution and the Supreme Court.

“Many American and other citizens who are legally present in this country have been subjected to important intrusions on their freedom,” the lawyers of the complainants wrote. “Many were physically injured; at least two were taken to a relaxation center.”

The Trump administration said that the order was too restrictive, “threatening sanctions agents if the court does not believe that they were on additional factors to make a particular stop”.

D John Sauer, the general request, also argued that the order could not bear the recent decision of the high court restricting the universal injunctions, although the applicants did not agree.

The order of Frimpong, which was appointed by Joe Biden, prevented the authorities from using factors such as the breed or apparent ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, a presence in a place such as a trotting or car washing, or the occupation of someone as the only basis for reasonable suspicions of detention. It is covered a population combined with nearly 20 million people, almost half of whom identify as Hispanic or Latino.

The applicants included three detained immigrants and two American citizens. One of the citizens was the resident of Los Angeles, Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video of June 13 seized by federal agents shouting: “I was born here in the United States. East la, bro! “

Gavidia was released about 20 minutes later after showing agents for his identification, just like another citizen stopped during a car washing, according to the trial.

The agents arrested Pedro Vasquez Perceomo, an applicant appointed in the case, to a bus stop in June while he was waiting to be taken care of.

“When Ice caught me, they never showed a mandate or explained why. I was treated as if I did not matter – locked up, cold, hungry and without a lawyer. Now, the Supreme Court says that it is okay? It is not justice. It is racism with a badge,” said Vasquez Perdomo in a statement after the decision.