The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday formally struck down an abortion ban from 1849 that had technically retaken effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights.
In a 4-3 decision that came down along ideological lines, the court’s liberal majority affirmed a lower court ruling that overturned the 176-year-old ban and left in place a more recent law in Wisconsin allowing most abortions until about the 20th week of pregnancy.
“We conclude that comprehensive legislation enacted over the last 50 years regulating in detail the ‘who, what, where, when, and how’ of abortion so thoroughly covers the entire subject of abortion that it was meant as a substitute for the 19th century near-total ban on abortion,” liberal Justice Rebecca Dallet wrote in the majority opinion. “Accordingly, we hold that the legislature impliedly repealed [the 1849 ban] to abortion, and that [that law] therefore does not ban abortion in the State of Wisconsin.”
The ruling is a win for abortion rights activists in the battleground state, where Democrats had put the issue at the forefront of many elections — including two races in 2023 and 2025 that recalibrated the state Supreme Court’s ideological balance — in the years since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
The state’s 1849 law — enacted the year after Wisconsin was granted statehood — banned abortion in almost all cases by making performing the procedure a felony. Under the law, doctors who perform the procedure technically faced up to six years in prison and thousands of dollars in fines. The law included an exception for abortion care only to save the life of the woman, but not for her health or for rape or incest.
As was the case in many states with similar older laws, or newer so-called trigger laws, the ban technically snapped back into effect almost immediately after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to strike down Roe v. Wade in 2022. In short order, the decision prompted Planned Parenthood’s Wisconsin operations to suspend abortion services in the state.
But a series of legal developments then put the question of the law’s future before the state Supreme Court.
Shortly after the Roe decision, Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul, both Democrats, filed a suit arguing that the law had been effectively deemed invalid by more recent, more lenient abortion restriction legislation in the state. Evers and Kaul said at that time, in 2022, that they wouldn’t enforce the law. Both won re-election later that year and have maintained their promise.
But a state judge in July 2023 declared that the 1849 law did not apply to consensual medical abortions — the judge found that the original law intended to outlaw attacks on women that were intended as attempts to kill her unborn child — prompting abortion providers to resume care in the state in September 2023.
The district attorney of conservative-leaning Sheboygan County, Joel Urmanski, backed by abortion opponents and other Republican attorneys, appealed that ruling, arguing that the 1849 ban should remain the law of the land, eventually elevating the case to the state Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, in a separate case, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin sued in February asking the state Supreme Court to decide whether a constitutional right to abortion care exists in the state. Arguments haven’t been scheduled. But part of Wednesday’s decision could well forecast how judges decide on that case.
The decision Wednesday is the latest consequence of liberals having regained the majority of the technically nonpartisan court for the first time in 15 years in a bitter and expensive 2023 election that ended with progressive Janet Protasiewicz’s victory.
The race was largely defined by Protasiewicz’s support for abortion rights and opposition to the state’s heavily gerrymandered legislative maps. Both issues quickly came before the court following the election, and both ended with victories for the liberal parties in the cases.
The issue of abortion played a prominent role in this year’s state Supreme Court race as well, allowing liberals to maintain their narrow majority. Susan Crawford will be sworn in next month and did not participate in Wednesday’s decision.
The issue could also animate yet another race for a seat on the high court next year. Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley has announced she will run for another term, triggering what promises to be another expensive and contentious race. State Supreme Court elections are scheduled in Wisconsin each year from 2026 to 2030.
In her dissent, Bradley said the opinion by the court’s liberal majority “erases a law it does not like, making four lawyers sitting on the state’s highest court more powerful than the People’s representatives in the legislature.”
”Any remaining doubt over whether the majority’s decisions are motivated by the policy predilections of its members has been extinguished by its feeble attempt to justify a raw exercise of political power,” she added.
Wisconsin Democrats quickly said they’d use that dissent against Bradley in her re-election campaign next year — and would also highlight the ruling in what are expected to be competitive campaigns in 2026 in Wisconsin for the governorship and control of the legislature.
“It’s something that’s been front and center in our state as a top issue for voters,” Wisconsin Democratic Party spokesperson Philip Shulman said in an interview, adding that Democrats would plan to focus on the ruling “as we’re looking towards the 2026 cycle.”
Wisconsin Republican party Chair Brian Schimming said in a statement that, “The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s role is to follow the Constitution, not to make law. This issue should be resolved in the legislature and by voters, not by far-left justices parading as legislators.”
