‘I paid £15,000 then it went bust’

IVF patients are warned by unregulated “concierge clinics” after a popular bust leaves scores customers without treatment or refund.

As the number of IVF cycles financed by private has increased, online concierge companies have emerged, acting as “intermediaries” between patients, donors and doctors.

The fertility watchdog said that, as these clinics do not directly provide IVF treatment, it has no powers to regulate them. This requires that the law be strengthened to protect patients.

Syreeta Sandhu lost nearly £ 15,000 when his concierge clinic went bankrupt. “You are on your knees,” she said. “The upheaval has turned into frustration and angry.”

The mother of two children, 40, contacted the fertility of the company online after four cycles of failed IVF and five false layers, in the hope of having a third child.

She paid the apriticity, which paired it with an egg donor and contracted the fertility of the established King clinic. She had to start the treatment in December of last year when her appointments were canceled without explanation.

Syreeta discovered via the application of the company it ceased to operations on January 1.

When she contacted King’s, the clinic said that data protection rules meant that she did not have access to her file or to the coordinates of his egg donor. He had not been paid for by apriticity so that his treatment could not start.

“When you are on this trip, every month counts. You will do anything, and you throw a lot of money there,” she said.

“It takes a lot of time to meet [medical staff] You can trust, “she said.” I spent almost 12 months to build this confidence and it just fell. “”

Concierge clinics offer services such as patients with donors and doctors, an appointment reservation and the publication of drugs.

It is not clear how many operations in the United Kingdom, but experts think that their number is increasing.

Satellite arrangements – where patients attend medical appointments with a doctor, generally their own general practitioner, then undergo the IVF process elsewhere – is an established configuration of fertility care. But the concierge clinics have no physical premises or do not themselves store eggs, sperm or embryos.

The fertility watchdog, Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA), warns patients that these new services are not covered by its protections.

Clare Ettinghausen, Director of HFEA’s strategy and business affairs, said: “The benefits of the closure of apriticity and the effect it has on patients emphasizes how the current law does not reflect the range and the type of fertility treatments offered today.”

She said that the watchdog asked that the law on fertilization and human embryology be revised to take into account The different ways in which fertility services are provided.

Syreeta is one of the 52 patients due to money by apriticity. The company owes a total of £ 119,000 to its patients, according to the liquidator appointed to manage his debts, Cork Gully.

Beth Rodgers, 32, of Belfast has Turner’s syndrome, a rare genetic condition which means that its ovaries do not produce eggs. Because Northern Ireland has a serious shortage of donor eggs, Beth had to secure a donor in England.

She and her partner paid the apriticity of £ 4,600 and had been twinned with an egg donor.

“Then, I saw a comment on a Facebook group saying” thinking of all the people affected by the news of apriticity “, she said. “There was no communication, no number to call.”

The couple was able to claim part of the money on his insurance, but they did not cover a fees of £ 385 for an appointment with the doctor and £ 985 for compensation for donors.

“Time was probably the greatest thing I felt that I had lost. It was such a long process,” said Beth.

She has now restarted treatment with a regulated clinic. She had appointments with a doctor in the Republic of Ireland and went to Manchester for the transfer of embryos.

This transfer failed, but it will be able to obtain another IVF cycle on its insurance with another egg donor.

In recent years, more British couples have paid a private fertility treatment, in part because IVF on the NHS is a postal code lottery.

Jonathan, not his real name, and his wife crossed five cycles of IVF failed before going to apriticity. They paid £ 10,000 for treatment with their savings and a loan.

“We were told that there was no realistic chance to recover our money,” he said. “We have not yet been able to resume treatment because we are still trying to raise finances.”

Cork Gully told Jonathan and other patients in a letter seen by the BBC: “It is unlikely that there are funds to pay for patients.”

He said affected patients should come into contact.

The BBC asked Mel Chacksfield, who was general manager of Apricity when he stopped operations, why the company had been suffered and if the patients were reimbursed, but it did not respond to our request.

However, Caroline Noublanche, one of the founders of the company and the previous director general, told the BBC that he had “encountered sudden and irreversible financial difficulties in December when the investment of an investor had been withdrawn”.

Professor Emily Jackson is a researcher in medical and ethical law at the London School of Economics. She said: “You need a license to do things with embryos and sperm and eggs, but you don’t need a license to offer to organize things on the Internet.

“For people who reflect on their options, it is probably wise to opt for treatment in a clinic under HFEA license, as they have responsibilities for patients in the event of closure.”

These responsibilities mean that if an HFEA license clinic closes, it should give patients information and ensure that they are supported.

The clinic must also ensure that all eggs, sperm and embryos are in stock are safe.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Services said to BBC News: “While digital or” virtual “clinics are not currently relevant to the delivery of fertilization and human embryology, the ministers have met his chair to discuss emerging regulatory challenges.

“The government is currently considering HFEA’s recommendations on the modernization of fertility law. We advise all those who plan to use digital clinics to carry out in -depth research before making decisions.”

The fertility of King, who provided the treatment of Syreeta, was an entrepreneur of Apricity’s and is now a creditor of the company.

Its director, Dr. IPPOKRATIS SARRIS, consultant in reproductive medicine, said that these were probably more concierge clinics would emerge in the future while patients were looking for convenience and flexibility.

“Change to more distant and digital care models is an inevitable progression in today’s world. This is more and more what patients want and often prefer, so it is important that we don’t deny this choice.”

But he advised patients to do careful research before choosing a supplier and being prudent to pay in advance for multi-cycles plans.

“It is wise to examine the duration of a clinic, which owns it (NHS, private individual or investment capital), and to make an informed choice,” he added.

“We must not resist change, but we must be proactive to shape it in a responsible manner.”

Get our flagship newsletter with all the titles you need to start the day. Register here.