Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to rule on its plan to end birthright citizenship

Washington – The Trump Administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to rule definitively on the question of whether the decree of the pretending president put an end to the automatic citizenship of the dawn is constitutional.

The two calls, arising from the affairs of the state of Washington and the New Hampshire, will probably determine once and for all if the controversial proposal can go ahead.

It has long been assumed that anyone born on American soil becomes a citizen, with the exception of the children of diplomats, as have in the 14th amendment of the Constitution.

The Romanesque position of the Trump administration is that the guarantee does not apply to temporary visitors who have legally entered the country or to the people who have entered the country illegally.

The interpretation long accepted with a broad right to citizenship which has been influenced for more than a century is an “erroneous vision” of the 14th amendment which “has become omnipresent, with destructive consequences”, said the request general D. John Sauer in the court documents.

The new calls to the Supreme Court differ from the cases that the Supreme Court decided earlier this year in favor of the administration, which concerned only the technical question of knowing whether the federal judges had the power to block politics nationally while the dispute continued.

Unlike previous affairs, the latest deposits are not emergency requests on which the court will act quickly. These are regular calls that could take months to resolve the court, probably after agreeing to hear business and then hear oral arguments.

Sauer suggested that the court decides on the affairs of its new mandate, which begins in October and ends in June of next year.

Friday evening, business had not yet been officially posed in court.

NBC News obtained them from the Office General of the State of Washington, which filed one of the underlying prosecution, and the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the individual complainants in the New Hampshire case.

The Ministry of Justice could not be joined to comment.

Cody Woffy, deputy director of the ACLU immigrant rights project, said the decree was illegal on Friday evening and that “no quantity of maneuver of the administration will change this”.