Prime editor-based high-throughput screening reveals functional synonymous mutations in human cells
Kimura, M. Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Nature 267, 275–276 (1977).
Google Scholar
Shen, X., Song, S., Li, C. & Zhang, J. Synonymous mutations in representative yeast genes are mostly strongly non-neutral. Nature 606, 725–731 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kruglyak, L. et al. Insufficient evidence for non-neutrality of synonymous mutations. Nature 616, E8–E9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cuevas, J. M., Domingo-Calap, P. & Sanjuan, R. The fitness effects of synonymous mutations in DNA and RNA viruses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 17–20 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kristofich, J. et al. Synonymous mutations make dramatic contributions to fitness when growth is limited by a weak-link enzyme. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007615 (2018).
Google Scholar
Walsh, I. M., Bowman, M. A., Soto Santarriaga, I. F., Rodriguez, A. & Clark, P. L. Synonymous codon substitutions perturb cotranslational protein folding in vivo and impair cell fitness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3528–3534 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lebeuf-Taylor, E., McCloskey, N., Bailey, S. F., Hinz, A. & Kassen, R. The distribution of fitness effects among synonymous mutations in a gene under directional selection. eLife 8, e45952 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sauna, Z. E. & Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 683–691 (2011).
Google Scholar
Supek, F., Minana, B., Valcarcel, J., Gabaldon, T. & Lehner, B. Synonymous mutations frequently act as driver mutations in human cancers. Cell 156, 1324–1335 (2014).
Google Scholar
Buske, O. J., Manickaraj, A., Mital, S., Ray, P. N. & Brudno, M. Identification of deleterious synonymous variants in human genomes. Bioinformatics 29, 1843–1850 (2013).
Google Scholar
Rentzsch, P., Witten, D., Cooper, G. M., Shendure, J. & Kircher, M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D886–D894 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Google Scholar
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 402–410 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhu, S. et al. Guide RNAs with embedded barcodes boost CRISPR-pooled screens. Genome Biol 20, 20 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhu, S. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR activation screen identifies candidate receptors for SARS-CoV-2 entry. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 701–717 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sharma, Y. et al. A pan-cancer analysis of synonymous mutations. Nat. Commun. 10, 2569 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kolde, R., Laur, S., Adler, P. & Vilo, J. Robust rank aggregation for gene list integration and meta-analysis. Bioinformatics 28, 573–580 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cheng, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science 381, eadg7492 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mathy, C. J. P. et al. A complete allosteric map of a GTPase switch in its native cellular network. Cell Syst. 14, 237–246 (2023).
Google Scholar
He, Y. et al. Near-atomic resolution visualization of human transcription promoter opening. Nature 533, 359–365 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. K. et al. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 198–206 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mathis, N. et al. Predicting prime editing efficiency and product purity by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1151–1159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V. & Gulin, A. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. In Proc 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Bengio, S. et al.) 6639–6649 (NIPS, 2018).
Jaganathan, K. et al. Predicting splicing from primary sequence with deep learning. Cell 176, 535–548 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wagner, N. et al. Aberrant splicing prediction across human tissues. Nat. Genet. 55, 861–870 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barry, T., Wang, X., Morris, J. A., Roeder, K. & Katsevich, E. SCEPTRE improves calibration and sensitivity in single-cell CRISPR screen analysis. Genome Biol 22, 344 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nackley, A. G. et al. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase haplotypes modulate protein expression by altering mRNA secondary structure. Science 314, 1930–1933 (2006).
Google Scholar
Tuller, T. et al. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141, 344–354 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bae, H. & Coller, J. Codon optimality-mediated mRNA degradation: linking translational elongation to mRNA stability. Mol. Cell 82, 1467–1476 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dhindsa, R. S. et al. A minimal role for synonymous variation in human disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 109, 2105–2109 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cuella-Martin, R. et al. Functional interrogation of DNA damage response variants with base editing screens. Cell 184, 1081–1097 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hanna, R. E. et al. Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens. Cell 184, 1064–1080 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dujon, B. Basic principles of yeast genomics, a personal recollection. FEMS Yeast Res. 15, fov047 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chamary, J. V., Parmley, J. L. & Hurst, L. D. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 98–108 (2006).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Genome-wide screening for functional long noncoding RNAs in human cells by Cas9 targeting of splice sites. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1203–1210 (2018).
Google Scholar
Radrizzani, S., Kudla, G., Izsvak, Z. & Hurst, L. D. Selection on synonymous sites: the unwanted transcript hypothesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 431–448 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kudla, G., Murray, A. W., Tollervey, D. & Plotkin, J. B. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324, 255–258 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gu, W., Zhou, T. & Wilke, C. O. A universal trend of reduced mRNA stability near the translation-initiation site in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000664 (2010).
Google Scholar
Yan, J. et al. Improving prime editing with an endogenous small RNA-binding protein. Nature 628, 639–647 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ren, X. et al. High-throughput PRIME-editing screens identify functional DNA variants in the human genome. Mol. Cell 83, 4633–4645 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gould, S. I. et al. High-throughput evaluation of genetic variants with prime editing sensor libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02172-9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cirincione, A. et al. A benchmarked, high-efficiency prime editing platform for multiplexed dropout screening. Nat. Methods 22, 92–101 (2025).
Google Scholar
Belli, O., Karava, K., Farouni, R. & Platt, R. J. Multimodal scanning of genetic variants with base and prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02439-1 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Oh, H. C., Lee, S. & Kim, H. H. Saturation profiling of drug-resistant genetic variants using prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02465-z (2024).
Google Scholar
Herger, M. et al. High-throughput screening of human genetic variants by pooled prime editing. Cell Genom. 5, 100814 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3406–3415 (2003).
Google Scholar
Morales, J. et al. A joint NCBI and EMBL-EBI transcript set for clinical genomics and research. Nature 604, 310–315 (2022).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Google Scholar
Masella, A. P., Bartram, A. K., Truszkowski, J. M., Brown, D. G. & Neufeld, J. D. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for Illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 31 (2012).
Google Scholar
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).
Google Scholar
Xu, P. et al. Genome-wide interrogation of gene functions through base editor screens empowered by barcoded sgRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1403–1413 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cleveland, W. S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 829–836 (1979).
Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Google Scholar
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004).
Google Scholar
Hinrichs, A. S. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D590–D598 (2006).
Google Scholar
Ding, B. et al. Noncoding loci without epigenomic signals can be essential for maintaining global chromatin organization and cell viability. Sci. Adv. 7, eabi6020 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Google Scholar
Replogle, J. M. et al. Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 954–961 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K.edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y., Gojobori, T. & Ikemura, T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 292 (2000).
Google Scholar
Gruber, A. R., Lorenz, R., Bernhart, S. H., Neubock, R. & Hofacker, I. L. The Vienna RNA websuite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W70–W74 (2008).
Google Scholar
Tang, W. et al. Data and code related to ‘Prime editor-based high-throughput screening reveals functional synonymous mutations in human cells’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14639522 (2025).
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Health-GettyImages-2207179977-0729bd02977e47088d387ed4fbb633af.jpg?w=390&resize=390,220&ssl=1 "What To Eat After Food Poisoning: Safe Foods and Drinks")
