Attention Hogg – RedState

The words count. The choice of words is important.

The Los Angeles Times has published an article today. It is open with the following elements:

Matthew Dowd’s dismissal opened a flood door.

The MSNBC political analyst, who lost his job shortly after full comments on the conservative activist killed Charlie Kirk, was the first of many figures to face consequences Thursday for public statements or actions on the shooting.

To be clear, the word “murdered” was used in the article as a quote from someone offended by the stupidity of Dowd.

Six people participated in the compilation of this article. A project of the article would then go through the publishers, at least one and probably two. Thus, seven or eight people did not use “murder” or “assassination” to describe the brutal political assassination of Kirk. Omissions were intentional. The push of the article concerns people faced with consequences to be horrible in the light of Kirk murder.

The article also mentions that a journalist named Ag Gancarski was suspended for an ignorant and inappropriate question. Gancarski sent an SMS to a member of the Florida Congress after the kirk murder. Gancarski’s text was sent 23 minutes after Kirk was shot. He asked:

“Wondered if Charlie Kirk gets affecting your position on transporting the campus?” If the control of firearms had been at stake could have been avoided? ”

Beyond the question that is poorly supervised, the question could have had a certain relevance, perhaps a week after the assassination of Kirk, if and only if the facts of the assassination were affected by the laws of “transport” of UTAH. But none of these things was true. It was remarkably poorly visible and, from a factual point of view, completely out of purpose.

The leftists seem to have cornered the market on bad timing and wickedness.

In addition to the massive quantity of bile paid online by trolls, speaking heads and nose ring nose in search of attention, there are high -level leftists who also look for the spotlight. They are looking for attention and throw any feeling of timing by the window. One of these people is David Hogg. Hogg is a Harvard graduate – a fact that is both incredible and absurd.

The Hoggsims are sadly famous. Its x posts can be disturbed and wild. I have often folded them and I wonder if his next statement could exceed the previous one. Here are some:

The NRA must be appointed a terrorist organization for the role that their supporters played in the staging and the insurrectionist coup.

– David Hogg 🟧 (@ davidhogg111) January 8, 2021

And

If you need a license to kill deer, why don’t you need it to kill humans?

– David Hogg 🟧 (@ davidhogg111) April 2, 2022

Hogg has a gift for bad timing and looking for attention. Three days after the murder of Charlie Kirk, Hogg could not stand up without standing on a kitchen table and demanding that we pay attention to him. In the craziest messages “what’s me”, Hogg demanded that we recognize him as a voice equal to Charlie Kirk and that he, David Hogg, Harvard Grad and General Loudmouth, could be in the reticle.

If I am killed by one of these right -wing wingers politicizes the fuck of my death immediately (I speak before my blood is cold) and that I use it to adopt as many laws on firearms as possible and collect as much money as possible to primary demons which refuse to support the laws on firearms.

– David Hogg 🟧 (@ davidhogg111) September 13, 2025

No, David – you’re just a loudmouth. Kirk was a target of your fellow men because he made sense and was effectively argued. You are like a 5 -year -old child who screams for attention. No one is going after you, David. You are not a target. You are a discomfort. A child who is looking for attention, nothing more. Yes, we are tired of your headache, but you are no more threat that you are threatened.

The left clearly indicated that as a group, they wanted to close Charlie Kirk because it was effective. He won hearts and minds. As conservatives, we find Hogg boring, but no one wants to shout or close it.

Sometimes the best way to win an argument is to allow attention to speak.