Bonta ‘disappointed’ by Supreme Court ruling on L.A. immigration raids
The highest official of the California law application weighed on Monday’s Supreme Court on Monday on the application of immigration on Monday.
Atty. General Rob Bonta has condemned the decision, which opens the way to immigration agents to stop and question the people they suspect of being in the United States according to information only as their race or their perceived workplace.
Speaking at a press conference on Monday in downtown La, Bonta said he agreed with the statements that ACLU had presented in his trial against the Trump administration. He called the blind tactics used to make an immigration arrests a violation of the 4th amendment, which prohibits searches and unreasonable crises.
Bonta said he was thinking that he is unconstitutional “for ice agents, federal immigration officers, to use the race, the inability to speak English, location or perceived occupation to … stop and hold, seek, grasp the Californians.”
He also described what he described as the growing dependence of the Supreme Court with regard to his emergency file, which, according to him, often obscures the decision -making of the judges.
“It’s disappointing,” he said. “And the emergency file has been used more and more. You often don’t know who voted and how. There is no argument. There is no written opinion. “
Bonta called the opinion of the Brett judge Mr. Kavanaugh “very disturbing”.
The judge appointed by Trump argued that, because many people who do day work in areas such as construction or agriculture, commitment to such work could be useful to help immigrant agents determine people to arrest.
Bonta said that practice allows “the use of the breed to potentially discriminate”, saying “it’s disturbing and it’s disturbing”.
