Scientists rush to bolster climate finding Trump administration aims to undo | US news

Veteran climatologists organize a public comment coordinated by a report by the American energy department (DOE) which casts doubt on the scientific consensus on the climate crisis.

The report, published at the end of last month, said that concerns about the planet’s fossil fuels are exaggerated, arousing widespread concerns on the part of scientists who declared that it was full of climate disinformation; This was an attempt to support a proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to cancel the “endangering conclusion”, which constitutes the legal basis for almost all American climate regulations.

“A public commentary on experts can be useful because it injects an analysis of experts into a decision -making process that could otherwise be dominated by political, economic or ideological considerations,” said Andrew Dessler, a climate researcher at Texas A&M University who organizes the response to the report. “Experts can identify technical errors, highlight the neglected data and clarify uncertainties so as to improve the precision and robustness of the policy or the final report.”

The answer is part of a wider wave of experts’ attempts to maintain the science of the climate established while the Trump administration promotes contrary and unproven points of view.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM), the best group of scientific advisers in the country, launched an “accelerated” examination of the latest evidence on the way in which tightening gases threaten human health and well -being – a decision announced following the implementation of the proposed danger search.

Nasem, who advises EPA and other federal agencies, plans to publish their conclusions in September, in time to shed light on the EPA decision on the conclusion of endangerment. The initiative will be self -funded by the organization – a very unusual practice of the approved group at Congress, which generally responds to calls from federal organizations to advice.

“It is essential that the development of federal policies is informed by the best scientific evidence available,” said Marcia McNutt, president of the National Academy of Sciences, in a statement.

Trump administration efforts to block data access have also inspired the decline. This month, the president ousted the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after saying without foundation that the data he publishes is “rigged”.

In previous weeks, federal officials also deleted key climate data and reports such as national climate assessments and the global American changes research program from government websites. The administration changed 70% more information on official environmental websites in its first 100 days that the first administration of Trump, according to a report that the data research group and governance published last week.

In light of these actions, research organizations such as the data on public environmental data and the Cornerstone sustainability data initiative worked to protect and publish data that the federal government hides from the public.

“Science attacks are dangerous because they erode one of the most effective tools in society to understand the world and make decisions in the public interest,” said Drawing. “When political or ideological forces undermine scientific institutions or discredit experts, they weaken our ability to exploit this powerful tool.”

Asked comments on the journal Nasem, a spokesperson for EPA repeated a comment proposed earlier this month: “The Congress has never explicitly given the authority of the EPA to impose regulations on greenhouse gases for cars and trucks.”

The Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to establish issues for cars if the EPA administrator determines that their emissions endanger public health or well-being. This includes greenhouse gas emissions due to the endangering conclusion.

Asked about the DEE report supporting the EPA post, the spokesperson for the Ministry of Energy, Ben Dietderich, also repeated a previous comment. “This report critically assesses many areas of the current scientific investigation which are frequently attributed to the high level of confidence-not by the scientists themselves, but by the political organizations involved, such as the United Nations or the previous presidential administrations,” he said.

The UN and the United States have regularly summoned the best scientists to produce scientific climatic reports, which warn that urgent actions to limit emissions are necessary.

Dietderich also said that officials “are looking forward to engaging with substantial comments” on the report.

However, “the real question is whether they will listen to us,” said Draw.