Families failed by Covid vaccines tell inquiry of their pain

The families of people injured by headdress vaccines told the British British investigation that they had been forced to support each other during the pandemic because there was no other aid.

Kate Scott, who represents the injured group’s vaccine and bereaved the United Kingdom (vibuk), said they thought they were almost pushed in the shadows during the pandemic. “

The investigation also heard a group of victims in Scotland, which made it fear that the vaccine was deployed too quickly and that security was sacrificed for speed.

This is the fourth module of the survey, which will take into account questions relating to the development of COVVI-19 vaccines and their implementation.

Ms. Scott, whose husband Jamie was seriously handicapped by a vaccine, said: “We are an uncomfortable truth, but we are a truth and the truth is for everyone in our group – the vaccine caused serious damage and death.”

Jamie Scott, a father of two boys, worked in a use of great power until he was seriously injured by a cocvid vaccine.

He spent four weeks and five days in a coma and underwent an extremely mortal side effect extremely rare called Vitt, or immune thrombosis induced by the vaccine and thrombocytopenia.

Jamie survived, but suffered an important brain injury, which affected his reflection processes. He is now partially blind and his wife says that he will never live independently.

Jamie received £ 120,000 – Maximum payment of the Damage Payment Payment Payment Payment by the Government.

His wife, who is clear that none of them is against vaccines, says that he will never work again and that it is not a just or adequate amount.

“The program is inadequate and ineffective-offers too little time and too little,” she said.

The survey learned that the figures for a freedom of information by Vibuk show that on November 30, 2024, the victims and their families made 17,519 claims to the regime.

Of these:

• 194 have been informed that they are entitled to payment
• 1,027 people waited for more than 12 months for a decision
• 126 people have no decision after waiting for three years

The president of the Covid investigation, Baroness Heather Hallett, spoke with a trembling voice saying to Jean Rossiter, whose son Peter died after having contracted Covid-19: “I too am the mother of two sons of a similar age in Peter, so I can only imagine the pain and the grief that you are going through.”

Peter Rossiter was a very talented classic pianist who gave life to music while the chief of music in a school, Jean in the investigation told.

However, although he was a key worker, he received his first vaccine until May 2021 – five months after the first Jab in the United Kingdom.

That summer, he was infected with Covid and fell seriously ill, was admitted to intensive care at the hospital but died on August 11, 2021.

Peter was kept in shape, said his mother Jean who helped create the COVVI-19 group the bereaved families for justice in the United Kingdom.

“He followed the rules, we have all done and it seems to us that we have done everything well and yet Peter has lost his life, just like so many families who are in our group,” she said.

Baroness Hallett said, “So many people have said that Covid-19 only affects the elderly.

“You have had a young son in good shape and healthy, under 40, and it therefore helps to remind people that we are not only to protect people who, according to some, have had a good round; we want to protect the whole population.”

Minded families have also raised concerns concerning:

• delays in some people receiving vaccines
• Bad communication of advice for the public
• The dosage interval – the gap between the second and third doses of the vaccine
• the prioritization of certain groups of people in front of other

The Scottish Vaccine Buthing Group (SVIG), which represents 750 people, said that it feared that the vaccine was deployed too quickly and that security had been sacrificed for speed.

He also raised serious concerns about the payment of damage caused by the government of the government of the government.

Ruth O’Raffety, from Svig, said that it was “a traumatic experience” for anyone postulating.

Being at 60% disabled is a criterion for the price. She asked how anyone could prove that when her condition fluctuates. She also said that many of their members had suffered neurological damage and had struggled to fill the forms.

The survey will hear evidence over the next three weeks in this issue in London.