Gavin Newsom Sues Fox News for $787 Million, Claiming Network Defamed Him over L.A. Riots
California Governor Gavin Newsom continues Fox News for $ 787 million compared to his “deceptive assembly” of an appeal he had with the president during the Los Angeles immigration riot.
The pursuit of Newsom, deposited on Friday and reported by a variety of media, accused that the prime host Jesse Wattes said that the governor had lied about his telephone calls with President Trump, who ordered the troops of the National Guard in Los Angeles earlier this month.
Historically, politicians and legislators have avoided the pursuit of the media because the bar to win is high and most of them consider as unflattering or inaccurate coverage the cost of doing business in the political arena. But that has not dissuaded the governor concerned about the media that many expect to present himself to the presidency in 2028.
Politico reported that Newsom lawyers argue that the Watters program wrongly published a Trump video to support their assertion.
In an article on X, Newsom said that the request of $ 787 million in damages is similar to the $ 787.5 million regulations made with Dominion Voting Systems for alleged deception report following Trump’s defeat in 2020 against Joe Biden.
“If Fox News wants to lie to the American people on behalf of Donald Trump, it should face consequences – as in the Dominion case,” Newsom said in a statement in Thewrap. “I believe that the American people should be able to trust the information they receive from a big media. Until Fox is ready to be honest, I will continue to fight their propaganda machine. ”
According to the trial, Newsom spoke for the last time to the president on June 7 for approximately 16 minutes in a call which one day came after President Trump sent 2,000 troops of the National Guard to Los Angeles to counter the demonstrators in the midst of the anti-ice demonstrations.
The cover of the combination by the costume reported:
On June 10, according to the trial, Trump said that he had spoken to Newsom “one day”, against which Newsom had pushed. Watters would then have asked the air: “Why would Newsom lie and claim that Trump never called him?” While displaying a screenshot of Trump’s call on June 7 with Newsom on the screen, which had been obtained by Fox News journalist John Roberts.
In short, the pursuit alleged that President Trump’s wrong memory with the date of the call was used to portray Newsom as a liar in the Watters segment.
Newsom lawyers claim that the allegedly misleading report corresponds to the legal standard of defamation. The prosecution was filed before the Superior Court of Delaware, Fox News is incorporated.
The trial also claims that the report injured Newsom’s position in the eyes of voters, which could cost him the future elections.
In order to prove the defamation, the applicants must show that a media member or an outlet acted with maliciousness to harm the reputation of an official of the public while completely ignoring the facts or evidence which would prove that their declarations are false.
This has traditionally been difficult to prove in court.
The contributor Lowell Cauffiel is the best -selling author of Under the line And nine other criminal novels and non-fictional titles. See Lowellcauffiel.com For more.
.jpg?w=390&resize=390,220&ssl=1 "The French Bob Is Summer’s Most Chic Haircut")