Crick, F. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227, 561–563 (1970).
Google Scholar
Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).
Naveed, H. et al. A comprehensive overview of large language models. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 16, 106 (2025).
Google Scholar
Scarselli, F., Gori, M., Tsoi, A. C., Hagenbuchner, M. & Monfardini, G. The graph neural network model. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 20, 61–80 (2008).
Google Scholar
Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6840–6851 (2020).
Wang, H. et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620, 47–60 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jiang, K. et al. Rapid in silico directed evolution by a protein language model with EVOLVEpro. Science 387, eadr6006 (2025).
Google Scholar
Brixi, G., Durrant, M.G., Ku, J. et al. Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10176-5 (2026).
Nguyen, E. et al. Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo. Science 386, eado9336 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zou, S. et al. A large-scale foundation model for RNA function and structure prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625345 (2024).
Dalla-Torre, H. et al. Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics. Nat. Methods 22, 287–297 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Shen, W. X., Liu, Q. & Zitnik, M. Efficient generation of protein pockets with PocketGen. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1382–1395 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ying, K. et al. MethylGPT: a foundation model for the DNA methylome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.30.621013 (2024).
Bunne, C. et al. How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: priorities and opportunities. Cell 187, 7045–7063 (2024).
Google Scholar
Song, L., Segal, E. & Xing, E. Toward AI-driven digital organism: multiscale foundation models for predicting, simulating and programming biology at all levels. Prerpint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06993 (2024).
He, Y. et al. Generalized biological foundation model with unified nucleic acid and protein language. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 942–953 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bank, P. D. Protein Data Bank. Nat. New Biol. 233, 223 (1971).
Google Scholar
Topol, E. J. Learning the language of life with AI. Science 387, eadv4414 (2025).
Google Scholar
Merchant, A. T. et al. Semantic design of functional de novo genes from a genomic language model. Nature 649, 749–758 (2026).
Google Scholar
King, S. H. et al. Generative design of novel bacteriophages with genome language models. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675911 (2025).
Zhou, Z. et al. DNABERT-S: Pioneering species differentiation with species-aware DNA embeddings. Bioinformatics 41, i255–i264 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ellington, C. N. et al. Accurate and general DNA representations emerge from genome foundation models at scale. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.01.625444 (2024).
Zhao, Q., Zhang, C. & Zhang, W. dnaGrinder: a lightweight and high-capacity genomic foundation model. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15697 (2024).
Benegas, G., Albors, C., Aw, A. J., Ye, C. & Song, Y. S. A DNA language model based on multispecies alignment predicts the effects of genome-wide variants. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1960–1965 (2025).
Google Scholar
Saberi, A. et al. A long-context RNA foundation model for predicting transcriptome architecture. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.26.609813 (2024).
Tahmid, M. T. et al. BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization. Commun. Biol. 8, 1621 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yu, H. et al. An interpretable RNA foundation model for exploring functional RNA motifs in plants. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1616–1625 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. & Li, K. M. MP-RNA: unleashing multi-species RNA foundation model via calibrated secondary structure prediction. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 (eds Al-Onaizan, Y. et al.) 5278–5296 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Chen, J. et al. Interpretable RNA foundation model from unannotated data for highly accurate RNA structure and function predictions. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00300 (2022).
Zhang, Z. et al. RNAGenesis: foundation model for enhanced RNA sequence generation and structural insights. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.30.630826 (2024).
De Lima Camillo, L. P. et al. CpGPT: a foundation model for DNA methylation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.619766 (2024).
Zhou, H. et al. A foundation language model to decipher diverse regulation of RNAs. Genome Biol. 26, 301 (2025).
Google Scholar
Linder, J., Srivastava, D., Yuan, H., Agarwal, V. & Kelley, D. R. Predicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation. Nat. Genet. 57, 949–961 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fu, X. et al. A foundation model of transcription across human cell types. Nature 637, 965–973 (2025).
Google Scholar
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N. & Madani, A. ProGen2: exploring the boundaries of protein language models. Cell Syst. 14, 968–978 (2023).
Google Scholar
Madani, A. et al. Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1099–1106 (2023).
Google Scholar
Peng, F. Z. et al. PTM-Mamba: a PTM-aware protein language model with bidirectional gated Mamba blocks. Nat. Methods 22, 945–949 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Bian, B. & Okumura, M. Hyena architecture enables fast and efficient protein language modeling. IMetaOmics 2, e45 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhuo, L. et al. ProtLLM: an interleaved protein-language LLM with protein-as-word pre-training. In Proc. 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 1 (eds Ku, L.-W. et al.) 8950–8963 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Xu, M., Yuan, X., Miret, S. & Tang, J. ProtST: multi-modality learning of protein sequences and biomedical texts. In Proc. 40th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (eds Krause, A. et al.) 38749–38767 (PMLR, 2023).
Queen, O. et al. ProCyon: a multimodal foundation model for protein phenotypes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.10.627665 (2025).
Consortium UniProt. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D523–D531 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xiong, P., Xu, H. & Zheng, H. Supervised contrastive learning leads to more reasonable spectral embeddings. Anal. Chem. 97, 20137–20146 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. MSBERT: embedding tandem mass spectra into chemically rational space by mask learning and contrastive learning. Anal. Chem. 96, 16599–16608 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huber, F. et al. Spec2Vec: improved mass spectral similarity scoring through learning of structural relationships. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008724 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bushuiev, R. et al. Self-supervised learning of molecular representations from millions of tandem mass spectra using DreaMS. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02663-3 (2025).
Cui, H. et al. scGPT: toward building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI. Nat. Methods 21, 1470–1480 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hao, M. et al. Large-scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 21, 1481–1491 (2024).
Google Scholar
Theodoris, C. V. et al. Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology. Nature 618, 616–624 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kalfon, J., Samaran, J., Peyré, G. & Cantini, L. scPRINT: pre-training on 50 million cells allows robust gene network predictions. Nat. Commun. 16, 3607 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rizvi, S. A. et al. Scaling large language models for next-generation single-cell analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.14.648850 (2025).
Wen, H. et al. Single cells are spatial tokens: transformers for spatial transcriptomic data imputation. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03038 (2023).
Hao, M. et al. GeST: towards building a generative pretrained transformer for learning cellular spatial context. Proc. 20th Machine Learning in Computational Biology Meeting 311, 1–11 (PMLR, 2025).
Tejada-Lapuerta, A. et al. Nicheformer: a foundation model for single-cell and spatial omics. Nat. Methods 22, 2525–2538 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. X. et al. scGPT-spatial: continual pretraining of single-cell foundation model for spatial transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.05.636714 (2025).
Yang, X. et al. GeneCompass: deciphering universal gene regulatory mechanisms with a knowledge-informed cross-species foundation model. Cell Res. 34, 830–845 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, L. et al. RegFormer: a single-cell foundation model powered by gene regulatory hierarchies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.24.634217 (2025).
Yang, Z. et al. Multiomic foundation model predicts epigenetic regulation by zero-shot. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.19.629561 (2024).
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hayes, T. et al. Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model. Science 387, 850–858 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rosen, Y. et al. Universal cell embeddings: a foundation model for cell biology. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.28.568918 (2023).
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, W. et al. trRosettaRNA: automated prediction of RNA 3D structure with transformer network. Nat. Commun. 14, 7266 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shen, T. et al. Accurate RNA 3D structure prediction using a language model-based deep learning approach. Nat. Methods 21, 2287–2298 (2024).
Pearce, R., Omenn, G. S. & Zhang, Y. De novo RNA tertiary structure prediction at atomic resolution using geometric potentials from deep learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.15.491755 (2022).
Krishna, R. et al. Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384, eadl2528 (2024).
Wu, K. E. et al. Protein structure generation via folding diffusion. Nat. Commun. 15, 1059 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jing, B. et al. Eigenfold: generative protein structure prediction with diffusion models. In Workshop on Machine Learning for Drug Discovery (MLDD) at the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (eds. Notin, P. et al.) (2023).
Fu, C. et al. A latent diffusion model for protein structure generation. In Proc. Second Learning on Graphs Conference (eds Villar, S. & Chamberlain, B.) 29:1–29:17 (PMLR, 2024).
Anand, N. & Achim, T. Protein structure and sequence generation with equivariant denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Rao, R., Adler, J., Anand, N., Ingraham, J., Ovchinnikov, S. & Zhong, E. (eds) Workshop on Machine Learning in Structural Biology at the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2022).
Wang, Z. et al. RNADiffFold: generative RNA secondary structure prediction using discrete diffusion models. Brief. Bioinform. 26, bbae618 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fang, A., Zhang, Z., Zhou, A. & Zitnik, M. ATOMICA: learning universal representations of intermolecular interactions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.02.646906 (2025).
Watson, J. L. et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620, 1089–1100 (2023).
Google Scholar
Butcher, J. et al. De novo design of All-Atom biomolecular interactions with RFdiffusion3. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.18.676967 (2025).
Ahern, W. et al. Atom-level enzyme active site scaffolding using RFdiffusion2. Nat. Methods 23, 96–105 (2026).
Lisanza, S. L. et al. Multistate and functional protein design using RoseTTAFold sequence space diffusion. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1288–1298 (2025).
Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gruver, N. et al. Protein design with guided discrete diffusion. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 12489–12517 (2023).
Ni, B., Kaplan, D. L. & Buehler, M. J. Generative design of de novo proteins based on secondary-structure constraints using an attention-based diffusion model. Chem 9, 1828–1849 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. De novo protein design with a denoising diffusion network independent of pretrained structure prediction models. Nat. Methods 21, 2107–2116 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sarkar, A., Tang, Z., Zhao, C. & Koo, P. K. Designing DNA with tunable regulatory activity using discrete diffusion. In Workshop on AI for New Drug Modalities at the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (eds Uehara, M. et al.) (2024).
Hou, D. et al. A hyperbolic discrete diffusion 3D RNA inverse folding model for functional RNA design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 65, 6568–6584 (2025).
Zhao, Y., Oono, K., Takizawa, H. & Kotera, M. GenerRNA: a generative pre-trained language model for de novo RNA design. PLoS ONE 19, e0310814 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huang, B. et al. A backbone-centred energy function of neural networks for protein design. Nature 602, 523–528 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wallach, H. et al. (eds). Generative models for graph-based protein design. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 32 (Curran Associates, 2019).
Strokach, A., Becerra, D., Corbi-Verge, C., Perez-Riba, A. & Kim, P. M. Fast and flexible protein design using deep graph neural networks. Cell Syst. 11, 402–411 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Yin, H., Ling, F., Zhan, J. & Zhou, Y. SPIN-CGNN: improved fixed backbone protein design with contact map-based graph construction and contact graph neural network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011330 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. CellPose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).
Google Scholar
Archit, A. et al. Segment anything for microscopy. Nat. Methods 22, 579–591 (2025).
Google Scholar
He, L., Shi, R., Wang, W., Cai, Y. & Ma, L. Unifying the electron microscopy multiverse through a large-scale foundation model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.13.648639 (2025).
Pachitariu, M. & Stringer, C. CellPose 2.0: how to train your own model. Nat. Methods 19, 1634–1641 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Computer Vision 4015–4026 (IEEE, 2023).
Gupta, A. et al. SubCell: vision foundation models for microscopy capture single-cell biology. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.06.627299 (2024).
Ma, C., Tan, W., He, R. & Yan, B. Pretraining a foundation model for generalizable fluorescence microscopy-based image restoration. Nat. Methods 21, 1558–1567 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bilodeau, A. et al. A self-supervised foundation model for robust and generalizable representation learning in STED microscopy. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.06.656993 (2025).
Bilal, M. et al. Foundation models in computational pathology: a review of challenges, opportunities, and impact. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08333 (2025).
Vorontsov, E. et al. A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection. Nat. Med. 30, 2924–2935 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zimmermann, E. et al. Virchow2: scaling self-supervised mixed magnification models in pathology. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.00738 (2024).
Chen, R. J. et al. Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology. Nat. Med. 30, 850–862 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nicke, T. et al. Tissue Concepts v2: a supervised foundation model for whole slide images. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.05742 (2025).
Huang, Z., Bianchi, F., Yuksekgonul, M., Montine, T. J. & Zou, J. A visual-language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter. Nat. Med. 29, 2307–2316 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lu, M. Y. et al. A multimodal generative AI copilot for human pathology. Nature 634, 466–473 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. Slidechat: a large vision-language assistant for whole-slide pathology image understanding. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conf. 5134–5143 (2025).
Vaidya, A. et al. Molecular-driven foundation model for oncologic pathology. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.16652 (2025).
Xu, Y. et al. A multimodal knowledge-enhanced whole-slide pathology foundation model. Nat Commun 16, 11406 (2025).
Google Scholar
Senan, S. et al. DNA-Diffusion: leveraging generative models for controlling chromatin accessibility and gene expression via synthetic regulatory elements. In Workshop on Machine Learning for Genomics Explorations (MLGenX) at the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (eds Hajiramezanali, E. et al.) (2024).
Bai, Y., Zhong, H., Wang, T. & Lu, Z. J. OligoFormer: an accurate and robust prediction method for siRNA design. Bioinformatics 40, btae577 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wong, F. et al. Deep generative design of RNA aptamers using structural predictions. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 829–839 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xiong, D. et al. A structurally informed human protein–protein interactome reveals proteome-wide perturbations caused by disease mutations. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1510–1524 (2025).
Google Scholar
Réau, M., Renaud, N., Xue, L. C. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. DeepRank-GNN: a graph neural network framework to learn patterns in protein–protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 39, btac759 (2023).
Google Scholar
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein–nucleic acid complexes using RoseTTAFoldNA. Nat. Methods 21, 117–121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rajwade, D. et al. Understanding protein–DNA interactions by paying attention to protein and genomics foundation models. In Proc. NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Foundation Models for Science: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges (eds Chen, W. et al.) (2024).
Gainza, P. et al. De novo design of protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints. Nature 617, 176–184 (2023).
Google Scholar
Marchand, A. et al. Targeting protein–ligand neosurfaces with a generalizable deep learning tool. Nature 639, 522–531 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hie, B. L. et al. Efficient evolution of human antibodies from general protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 275–283 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schneuing, A. et al. Structure-based drug design with equivariant diffusion models. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 899–909 (2024).
Google Scholar
Igashov, I. et al. Equivariant 3D-conditional diffusion model for molecular linker design. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 417–427 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, X.-S. et al. Multiphysical graph neural network (MP-GNN) for COVID-19 drug design. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac231 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shanker, V. R., Bruun, T. U., Hie, B. L. & Kim, P. S. Unsupervised evolution of protein and antibody complexes with a structure-informed language model. Science 385, 46–53 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jonas, E. & Kuhn, S. Rapid prediction of NMR spectral properties with quantified uncertainty. J. Cheminform. 11, 50 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kang, S., Kwon, Y., Lee, D. & Choi, Y.-S. Predictive modeling of NMR chemical shifts without using atomic-level annotations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 3765–3769 (2020).
Google Scholar
Young, A., Röst, H. & Wang, B. Tandem mass spectrum prediction for small molecules using graph transformers. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 404–416 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, F., Chen, M. S., Rotskoff, G. M., Kanan, M. W. & Markland, T. E. Accurate and efficient structure elucidation from routine one-dimensional NMR spectra using multitask machine learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 2162–2170 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, M., Fondrie, W., Bittremieux, W., Oh, S. & Noble, W. S. De novo mass spectrometry peptide sequencing with a transformer model. In Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning (eds Chaudhuri, K. et al.) 25514–25522 (PMLR, 2022).
Liang, Y., Li, D., Xu, A. G., Shao, Y. & Tang, K. GeneBag: training a cell foundation model for broad-spectrum cancer diagnosis and prognosis with bulk RNA-seq data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.27.601098 (2024).
Theus, A., Barkmann, F., Wissel, D. & Boeva, V. CancerFoundation: a single-cell RNA sequencing foundation model to decipher drug resistance in cancer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.01.621087 (2024).
Maleki, S. et al. Efficient fine-tuning of single-cell foundation models enables zero-shot molecular perturbation prediction. In Workshop on Machine Learning for Genomics Explorations (MLGenX) at the 13th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (eds Hajiramezanali, E. et al.) (2025).
Sumanaweera, D. et al. Gene-level alignment of single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 22, 68–81 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ergen, C. et al. Consensus prediction of cell type labels in single-cell data with popV. Nat. Genet. 56, 2731–2738 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schuster, V., Dann, E., Krogh, A. & Teichmann, S. A. multiDGD: a versatile deep generative model for multi-omics data. Nat. Commun. 15, 10031 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zinati, Y., Takiddeen, A. & Emad, A. GRouNdGAN: GRN-guided simulation of single-cell RNA-seq data using causal generative adversarial networks. Nat. Commun. 15, 4055 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wan, J. et al. TriSAM: Tri-Plane SAM for zero-shot cortical blood vessel segmentation in VEM images. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 29, 8246–8255 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhuo, Z. et al. Segment anything for dendrites from electron microscopy. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE 6th International Conference on Image Processing, Applications and Systems (IPAS) pp. 1–6 (IEEE, 2025).
Van Gent, D. C. & Kanaar, R. Exploiting DNA repair defects for novel cancer therapies. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 2145–2148 (2016).
Google Scholar
Silverstein, R. A. et al. Custom CRISPR–Cas9 PAM variants via scalable engineering and machine learning. Nature 643, 539–550 (2025).
Google Scholar
Armingol, E., Officer, A., Harismendy, O. & Lewis, N. E. Deciphering cell–cell interactions and communication from gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 71–88 (2021).
Google Scholar
Singh, R. et al. Learning the language of antibody hypervariability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2418918121 (2025).
Google Scholar
Guan, C., Fernandes, F. C., Franco, O. L. & de la Fuente-Nunez, C. Leveraging large language models for peptide antibiotic design. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 6, 102359 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yang, K. K., Wu, Z. & Arnold, F. H. Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering. Nat. Methods 16, 687–694 (2019).
Google Scholar
Roney, M. & Aluwi, M. F. F. M. The importance of in-silico studies in drug discovery. Intell. Pharm. 2, 578–579 (2024).
Gottweis, J. et al. Towards an AI co-scientist. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18864 (2025).
Gridach, M., Nanavati, J., Abidine, K. Z. E., Mendes, L. & Mack, C. Agentic AI for scientific discovery: a survey of progress, challenges, and future directions. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08979 (2025).
Yamada, Y. et al. The AI Scientist-v2: workshop-level automated scientific discovery via agentic tree search. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08066 (2025).
Gao, S. et al. Empowering biomedical discovery with AI agents. Cell 187, 6125–6151 (2024).
Google Scholar
Swanson, K. et al. The virtual lab of AI agents designs new SARS-CoV-2 nanobodies. Nature 646, 716–723 (2025).
Google Scholar
Huang, K. et al. Biomni: a general-purpose biomedical AI agent. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.30.656746 (2025).
Wang, H. et al. SpatialAgent: an autonomous AI agent for spatial biology. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.03.646459 (2025).
Youngblut, N. D. et al. scBaseCamp: an AI agent-curated, uniformly processed, and continually expanding single cell data repository. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.640494 (2025).
Loew, L. M. & Schaff, J. C. The virtual cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. Trends Biotechnol. 19, 401–406 (2001).
Google Scholar
Heimberg, G. et al. A cell atlas foundation model for scalable search of similar human cells. Nature 638, 1085–1094 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fischer, F. et al. scTab: scaling cross-tissue single-cell annotation models. Nat. Commun. 15, 6611 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gao, H. et al. Building a learnable universal coordinate system for single-cell atlas with a joint-VAE model. Commun. Biol. 7, 977 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Tahoe-100M: a giga-scale single-cell perturbation atlas for context-dependent gene function and cellular modeling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.20.639398 (2025).
Adduri, A. et al. Predicting cellular responses to perturbation across diverse contexts with STATE. In Workshop on AI Virtual Cells and Instruments: A New Era in Drug Discovery and Development at the 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (eds Gu, Q. et al.) (2024).
Roohani, Y. H. et al. Virtual Cell Challenge: toward a turing test for the virtual cell. Cell 188, 3370–3374 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wenckstern, J. et al. AI-powered virtual tissues from spatial proteomics for clinical diagnostics and biomedical discovery. Clin. Cancer Res. 31(13 Suppl.), B037 (2025).
Google Scholar
He, S. et al. Learning single-cell spatial context through integrated spatial multiomics with CORAL. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636038 (2025).
Li, J., Chen, S., Pan, X., Yuan, Y. & Shen, H.-B. Cell clustering for spatial transcriptomics data with graph neural networks. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 399–408 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bao, X., Bai, X., Liu, X., Shi, Q. & Zhang, C. Spatially informed graph transformers for spatially resolved transcriptomics. Commun. Biol. 8, 574 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, D. et al. Inferring super-resolution tissue architecture by integrating spatial transcriptomics with histology. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1372–1377 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, S. et al. Starfysh integrates spatial transcriptomic and histologic data to reveal heterogeneous tumor-immune hubs. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 223–235 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Liu, X., Hao, M., Liu, T. & Regev, A. PathOmCLIP: connecting tumor histology with spatial gene expression via locally enhanced contrastive learning of pathology and single-cell foundation model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.10.627865 (2024).
Almagro-Pérez, C. et al. AI-driven 3D spatial transcriptomics. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.17761 (2025).
Chen, W. et al. A visual–omics foundation model to bridge histopathology with spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 22, 1568–158 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cui, H. et al. Towards multimodal foundation models in molecular cell biology. Nature 640, 623–633 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tang, Z., Somia, N., Yu, Y. & Koo, P. K. Evaluating the representational power of pre-trained DNA language models for regulatory genomics. Genome Biol. 26, 203 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tsishyn, M., Hermans, P., Rooman, M. & Pucci, F. Residue conservation and solvent accessibility are (almost) all you need for predicting mutational effects in proteins. Bioinformatics 41, btaf322 (2025).
Google Scholar
Atti, S. & Subramaniam, S. Fundamental limitations of foundation models in single-cell transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.26.661767 (2025).
Kedzierska, K. Z., Crawford, L., Amini, A. P. & Lu, A. X. Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models. Genome Biol. 26, 101 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ahlmann-Eltze, C., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines. Nat. Methods 22, 1657–1661 (2025).
Google Scholar
Märtens, K., Donovan-Maiye, R. & Ferkinghoff-Borg, J. Enhancing generative perturbation models with LLM-informed gene embeddings. In Proc. ICLR 2024 Workshop on Machine Learning for Genomics Explorations (eds Theis, F. et al.) (2024).
Csendes, G., Sanz, G., Szalay, K. Z. & Szalai, B. Benchmarking foundation cell models for post-perturbation RNA-seq prediction. BMC Genomics 26, 393 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. Genbench: a benchmarking suite for systematic evaluation of genomic foundation models. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.01627 (2024).
Gao, Z. et al. PFMBench: protein foundation model benchmark. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.14796 (2025).
Qiu, P. et al. BioLLM: a standardized framework for integrating and benchmarking single-cell foundation models. Patterns (N.Y.) 6, 101326 (2025).
Google Scholar
Theodoris, C. V. Perspectives on benchmarking foundation models for network biology. Quant. Biol. 12, 335–338 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fishman, V. et al. GENA-LM: a family of open-source foundational DNA language models for long sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkae1310 (2025).
Google Scholar
Koonin, E. V., Wolf, Y. I. & Karev, G. P. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420, 218–223 (2002).
Google Scholar
Rood, J. E., Hupalowska, A. & Regev, A. Toward a foundation model of causal cell and tissue biology with a perturbation cell and tissue atlas. Cell 187, 4520–4545 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Benchmarking AI models for in silico gene perturbation of cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.629581 (2024).
Yuan, B. et al. CellBox: interpretable machine learning for perturbation biology with application to the design of cancer combination therapy. Cell Syst. 12, 128–140 (2021).
Google Scholar
Qian, L. et al. AI-empowered perturbation proteomics for complex biological systems. Cell Genomics 4, 100691 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pearce, J. D. et al. A cross-species generative cell atlas across 1.5 billion years of evolution: the TranscriptFormer Single-cell Model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650731(2025).
Zhang, Q., Stelzer, A. C., Fisher, C. K. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. Visualizing spatially correlated dynamics that directs RNA conformational transitions. Nature 450, 1263–1267 (2007).
Google Scholar
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Stubbington, M. J. T., Regev, A. & Teichmann, S. A. The Human Cell Atlas: from vision to reality. Nature 550, 451–453 (2017).
Google Scholar
Börner, K. et al. Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP): 3D Human Reference Atlas construction and usage. Nat. Methods 22, 845–860 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O. et al. The Human Tumor Atlas Network: charting tumor transitions across space and time at single-cell resolution. Cell 181, 236–249 (2020).
Google Scholar
Coleman, K. et al. Resolving tissue complexity by multimodal spatial omics modeling with MISO. Nat. Methods 22, 530–538 (2025).
Google Scholar
Long, Y. et al. Deciphering spatial domains from spatial multi-omics with SpatialGlue. Nat. Methods 21, 1658–1667 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zeng, Y. et al. Imputing spatial transcriptomics through gene network constructed from protein language model. Commun. Biol. 7, 1271 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, T. et al. SELF-Former: multi-scale gene filtration transformer for single-cell spatial reconstruction. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbae523 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schroeder, A. et al. Scaling up spatial transcriptomics for large-sized tissues: uncovering cellular-level tissue architecture beyond conventional platforms with iSCALE. Nat Methods 22, 1911–1922 (2025).
Google Scholar
Gandin, V. et al. Deep-tissue transcriptomics and subcellular imaging at high spatial resolution. Science 388, eadq2084 (2025).
Google Scholar
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. FDA announces plan to phase out animal testing requirement for monoclonal antibodies and other drugs. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-announces-plan-phase-out-animal-testing-requirement-monoclonal-antibodies-and-other-drugs (2025).
Kim, J., Koo, B.-K. & Knoblich, J. A. Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 571–584 (2020).
Google Scholar
Passaro, S. et al. Boltz-2: towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.14.659707 (2025).
Wechsler, H. (ed.). Neural Networks for Perception pp. 65–93 (Academic Press, 1992).
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction pp. 485–585 (Springer, 2008).
Cord, M. & Cunningham, P. (eds). Machine Learning Techniques for Multimedia: Case Studies on Organization and Retrieval pp. 21–49 (Springer, 2008).
O’shea, K. & Nash, R. An introduction to convolutional neural networks. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.08458 (2015).
Xing, F., Xie, Y., Su, H., Liu, F. & Yang, L. Deep learning in microscopy image analysis: A survey. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 29, 4550–4568 (2017).
Google Scholar
Banerji, S. & Mitra, S. Deep learning in histopathology: a review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 12, e1439 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dosovitskiy, A. et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. In 9th Int. Conf. Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021).
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conf. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4171–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
