Generation of modified cows and sheep from spermatid-like haploid embryonic stem cells
Li, W. et al. Androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells produce live transgenic mice. Nature 490, 407–411 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Generation of genetically modified mice by oocyte injection of androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell 149, 605–617 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Genetic modification and screening in rat using haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14, 404–414 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lin, J. C. & Van Eenennaam, A. L. Electroporation-mediated genome editing of livestock zygotes. Front. Genet. 12, 648482 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hai, T., Teng, F., Guo, R., Li, W. & Zhou, Q. One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 24, 372–375 (2014).
Google Scholar
He, W., Chen, J. & Gao, S. Mammalian haploid stem cells: establishment, engineering and applications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 2349–2367 (2019).
Google Scholar
Elling, U. et al. Forward and reverse genetics through derivation of haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 9, 563–574 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lu, J. et al. Structure-activity relationship studies of small-molecule inhibitors of Wnt response. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 3825–3827 (2009).
Google Scholar
Huang, S. M. et al. Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes Wnt signalling. Nature 461, 614–620 (2009).
Google Scholar
Smith, A. Formative pluripotency: the executive phase in a developmental continuum. Development 144, 365–373 (2017).
Google Scholar
Graf, A. et al. Fine mapping of genome activation in bovine embryos by RNA sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4139–4144 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Z. et al. Transcriptional profiles of bovine in vivo pre-implantation development. BMC Genomics 15, 756 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bogliotti, Y. S. et al. Efficient derivation of stable primed pluripotent embryonic stem cells from bovine blastocysts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2090–2095 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhao, L. et al. Establishment of bovine expanded potential stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018505118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhong, C. et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genetic screening in mice with haploid embryonic stem cells carrying a guide RNA library. Cell Stem Cell 17, 221–232 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yang, L., Song, L., Liu, X., Bai, L. & Li, G. KDM6A and KDM6B play contrasting roles in nuclear transfer embryos revealed by MERVL reporter system. EMBO Rep. 19, e46240 (2018).
Google Scholar
Czernik, M., Iuso, D., Toschi, P., Khochbin, S. & Loi, P. Remodeling somatic nuclei via exogenous expression of protamine 1 to create spermatid-like structures for somatic nuclear transfer. Nat. Protoc. 11, 2170–2188 (2016).
Google Scholar
He, W. et al. Reduced self-diploidization and improved survival of semi-cloned mice produced from androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells through overexpression of Dnmt3b. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 477–493 (2018).
Google Scholar
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rodgers, B. D. & Garikipati, D. K. Clinical, agricultural, and evolutionary biology of myostatin: a comparative review. Endocr. Rev. 29, 513–534 (2008).
Google Scholar
Irie, N. et al. SOX17 is a critical specifier of human primordial germ cell fate. Cell 160, 253–268 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ishii, T. & Pera, R. A. Creating human germ cells for unmet reproductive needs. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 470–473 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hwang, Y. S. et al. Reconstitution of prospermatogonial specification in vitro from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 5656 (2020).
Google Scholar
He, Z. Q. et al. Generation of mouse haploid somatic cells by small molecules for genome-wide genetic screening. Cell Rep. 20, 2227–2237 (2017).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. et al. Induction of the G2/M transition stabilizes haploid embryonic stem cells. Development 141, 3842–3847 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gao, G. et al. Transcriptome-wide analysis of the SCNT bovine abnormal placenta during mid- to late gestation. Sci. Rep. 9, 20035 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cheng, R. et al. Modification of alternative splicing in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos using engineered CRISPR-Cas13d. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 2257–2268 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kinoshita, M. et al. Pluripotent stem cells related to embryonic disc exhibit common self-renewal requirements in diverse livestock species. Development 148, dev199901 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. et al. Modulation of beta-catenin function maintains mouse epiblast stem cell and human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Commun. 4, 2403 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ross, P. J. & Cibelli, J. B. Bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Methods Mol. Biol. 636, 155–177 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Dissecting the molecular features of bovine-arrested eight-cell embryos using single-cell multi-omics sequencingdagger. Biol. Reprod. 108, 871–886 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alberio, R., Motlik, J., Stojkovic, M., Wolf, E. & Zakhartchenko, V. Behavior of M-phase synchronized blastomeres after nuclear transfer in cattle. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 57, 37–47 (2000).
Google Scholar
German, S. D., Lee, J. H., Campbell, K. H., Sweetman, D. & Alberio, R. Actin depolymerization is associated with meiotic acceleration in cycloheximide-treated ovine oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 92, 103 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. et al. Transient Dux expression facilitates nuclear transfer and induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming. EMBO Rep. 21, e50054 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Q. et al. Generation of fertile cloned rats by regulating oocyte activation. Science 302, 1179 (2003).
Google Scholar
Furusawa, T. et al. Characteristics of bovine inner cell mass-derived cell lines and their fate in chimeric conceptuses. Biol. Reprod. 89, 28 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ying, Q. L. et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519–523 (2008).
Google Scholar
Takashima, Y. et al. Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human. Cell 158, 1254–1269 (2014).
Google Scholar
Theunissen, T. W. et al. Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 15, 471–487 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bao, S. et al. Derivation of hypermethylated pluripotent embryonic stem cells with high potency. Cell Res. 28, 22–34 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency. Cell 169, 243–257 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Establishment of mouse expanded potential stem cells. Nature 550, 393–397 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gao, X. et al. Establishment of porcine and human expanded potential stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 687–699 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vilarino, M. et al. Derivation of sheep embryonic stem cells under optimized conditions. Reproduction 160, 761–772 (2020).
Google Scholar
Oh, S. K. et al. Methods for expansion of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 23, 605–609 (2005).
Google Scholar
De Los Angeles, A., Okamura, D. & Wu, J. Highly efficient derivation of pluripotent stem cells from mouse preimplantation and postimplantation embryos in serum-free conditions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2005, 29–36 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ludwig, T. E. et al. Feeder-independent culture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Methods 3, 637–646 (2006).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. M. et al. In vitro expansion of human sperm through nuclear transfer. Cell Res. 30, 356–359 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhong, C. et al. Generation of human haploid embryonic stem cells from parthenogenetic embryos obtained by microsurgical removal of male pronucleus. Cell Res. 26, 743–746 (2016).
Google Scholar
Elling, U. et al. Derivation and maintenance of mouse haploid embryonic stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 14, 1991–2014 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shirasawa, A. et al. Efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells and primordial germ cell-like cells in cattle. J. Reprod. Dev. 70, 82–95 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ross, P. J. et al. Activation of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by PLCZ cRNA injection. Reproduction 137, 427–437 (2009).
Google Scholar
Owen, J. R. et al. One-step generation of a targeted knock-in calf using the CRISPR-Cas9 system in bovine zygotes. BMC Genomics 22, 118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bustin, S. A. et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 55, 611–622 (2009).
Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. DNA-methylation analysis by the bisulfite-assisted genomic sequencing method. Methods Mol. Biol. 200, 143–154 (2002).
Google Scholar
Xie, Y. et al. An episomal vector-based CRISPR/Cas9 system for highly efficient gene knockout in human pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 2320 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chow, R. D., Chen, J. S., Shen, J. & Chen, S. A web tool for the design of prime-editing guide RNAs. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 190–194 (2021).
Google Scholar
Palazzese, L., Czernik, M., Iuso, D., Toschi, P. & Loi, P. Nuclear quiescence and histone hyper-acetylation jointly improve protamine-mediated nuclear remodeling in sheep fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 13, e0193954 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grobet, L. et al. A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle. Nat. Genet. 17, 71–74 (1997).
Google Scholar
Clop, A. et al. A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheep. Nat. Genet. 38, 813–818 (2006).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Spitzer, S., Agathou, S., Karadottir, R. T. & Smith, A. Gene editing in rat embryonic stem cells to produce in vitro models and in vivo reporters. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1262–1274 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M. & van Steensel, B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e168 (2014).
Google Scholar
Patch, A. M. et al. Whole-genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer. Nature 521, 489–494 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xie, C. & Tammi, M. T. CNV-seq, a new method to detect copy number variation using high-throughput sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 80 (2009).
Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. Mouse totipotent stem cells captured and maintained through spliceosomal repression. Cell 184, 2843–2859 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019).
Google Scholar
Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009).
Google Scholar
Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511–515 (2010).
Google Scholar
Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zhao, T. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic early embryonic-like programs during chemical reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 23, 31–45 (2018).
Google Scholar
Peng, G. et al. Spatial transcriptome for the molecular annotation of lineage fates and cell identity in Mid-gastrula Mouse Embryo. Dev. Cell 36, 681–697 (2016).
Zhi, M. et al. Generation and characterization of stable pig pregastrulation epiblast stem cell lines. Cell Res. 32, 383–400 (2022).
Wen, J. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals lineage segregation in early post-implantation mouse embryos. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 9840–9854 (2017).
Nakamura, T. et al. A developmental coordinate of pluripotency among mice, monkeys and humans. Nature 537, 57–62 (2016).
van Leeuwen, J., Berg, D. K. & Pfeffer, P. L. Morphological and gene expression changes in cattle embryos from hatched blastocyst to early gastrulation stages after transfer of in vitro produced embryos. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129787 (2015).
Pérez-Gómez, A., González-Brusi, L., Bermejo-Álvarez, P. & Ramos-Ibeas, P. Lineage differentiation markers as a proxy for embryo viability in farm ungulates. Front. Vet. Sci. 8, 680539 (2021).
