Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding over ‘sanctuary’ policies : NPR
An artistic installation, which displays black and white images of people detained or expelled as a result of ice raids in Southern California, is held outside the federal building in Los Angeles, Thursday, July 17, 2025.
Jae C. Hong / AP
hide
tilting legend
Jae C. Hong / AP
A judge judged on Friday evening that the Trump administration cannot denied Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles and 30 other cities and counties due to policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration efforts.
American district judge William Orrick in San Francisco has extended a preliminary injunction preventing the administration from cutting or conditioning the use of federal funds for so -called “sanctuary” courts. Its previous order has protected more than a dozen other cities and counties, including San Francisco, Portland and Seattle.
An email at the White House Friday evening was not immediately returned. In his decision, Orrick said that the administration had offered no opposition to an prolonged injunction, except to say that the first injunction was wrong. He called on the first order.
Orrick also prevented the administration from imposing immigration conditions on two specific subsidy programs.
The Trump administration has hung up pressure on the sanctuary communities as it seeks to illegally allow President Donald Trump’s campaign promise to withdraw millions of people in the country.
An executive decree issued by Trump ordered the Attorney General Pam Bondi and to the Secretary of Internal Security Kristi Noem to retain the federal money of the jurisdictions of the sanctuary. Another ordinance orders each federal agency to ensure that payments to the governments of states and premises do not “reconfine so -called” sanctuar “policies that seek to protect illegal expulsion foreigners”.
The cities and counties that have continued said billions of dollars were in danger.
Orrick, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said that the decrees and “executive actions that perceived them” were an “coercive threat” unconstitutional.
In May, the Ministry of Internal Security published a list of more than 500 “sanctuary jurisdictions”, saying that everyone would receive an official notification that the government had deemed them not in accordance. He also said that it would inform them if they were supposed to be in violation of federal criminal laws.
The list was then deleted from the ministry’s website after criticisms noted that it included localities that actively supported the administration’s difficult immigration policies.
The Ministry of Justice also continued New York, Los Angeles and other cities on their sanctuary policies.
There is no strict definition for sanctuary cities, but the terms generally describe places that limit cooperation with immigration and customs application. Ice applies immigration laws to the national level but requests the help of the authorities of the States and local authorities to identify the immigrants sought for the deportation and to hold them for the federal officers.
