GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4: Comparing benchmarks, price, and features

Yesterday, as OpenAI celebrated its 10th anniversary, the AI ​​company launched GPT-5.2its latest series of AI models to power ChatGPT. The latest version would be in response to The OpenAI “code red” rumor state, as the AI ​​market share leader reportedly moved its users to Google’s Gemini 3 and other AI chatbots.

The main competition seems to be between Gemini 3 and GPT-5.2because Google’s Gemini 3 made big waves since its launch in mid-November. Gemini 3 and GPT-5.2 appear to be neck and neck in most metrics, showing that OpenAI still has the chops to compete with the best. However, Grok 4.1 is also a leaderboard mainstay, and it’s being implemented some very good scores of its own.

So if you’re curious how GPT-5.2 compares to Grok 4.1, we can offer you an initial review. Keep in mind that GPT-5.2 is still fresh out of the box. This means that benchmark scores will definitely change over time as more people get their hands on it to put it to the test.

GPT-5.2 versus Grok 4.1: LMArena ranking

GPT-5.2 is not classified on most LMArena leaderboards at the time of writing these lines. So it’s difficult to compare the two directly from there. That doesn’t mean we can’t try. According to to OpenAIGPT-5.2 is a few percentage points better in almost every metric compared to GPT-5.1, which East ranked on LMArena.

Assuming that GPT-5.2 usurps GPT-5.1 in every category, we can conclude that GPT-5.2 will either be at the top or very close to the top of the charts. In the only metric for which GPT-5.2 currently exists on LMArena – which is WebDev – OpenAI’s model is currently ranked second overall (above Grok).

We can therefore conclude that GPT-5.2 will likely rank higher than Grok in almost all categories, although Grok may maintain its second place in the Text rankings, where it ranks just below Gemini 3.

GPT-5.2 vs. Grok 4.1: Benchmarks

Since GPT-5.2 is so new, it has not appeared on a numerous independent benchmark tests Again. For now, we have to rely on OpenAI’s self-reported benchmark scores. Keep in mind that these scores are part of a press release and have not been independently verified.

• Creative writing v3 – GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms Grok 4.1 here, with an ELO score of 1675.5 compared to 1268.6 for Grok 4.1.

• GDPval-AA – GPT-5.2 also wins this one, with a score of 1474 against 1041 for Grok.

• Diamond GPQA – GPT-5.2 scores another win here, but the gap is much smaller, with GPT-5.2 scoring 90.3% and Grok 4 scoring 87.7%.

• LOVE 2025 – GPT-5.1 beats Grok with a score of 95.7% to 92.7%. It stands to reason that GPT-5.2 will top the rankings here and beat Grok as well.

• BorderMaths – Another big win for GPT-5.2 here, with much higher accuracy than Grok 4.

The other benchmarks tell pretty much the same story. GPT-5.2 beats Grok 4.1 on benchmarks, and the margins are generally not very close. Actual results may vary, however, as benchmarks only tell part of the story.

GPT-5.2 versus Grok 4.1: availability

Both AI models are generally publicly available through OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Grok’s chat platform, respectively. In terms of features, both have AI chatbot functionality and the ability to generate images directly from the AI ​​chatbot. ChatGPT can create videos with the help by Sora 2, while Grok can generate videos and images from its Grok Imagine platform. Sora and Grok Imagine, however, are far behind rivals like Google’s Veo 3 and LumaAI’s Ray3.

Availability is largely the same, as most people interact with ChatGPT and Grok directly through their interfaces. However, ChatGPT is integrated into more products than Grok, giving it a leg up in terms of overall availability.

GPT-5.2 vs. Grok 4.1: Pricing

For GPT-5.2, you need to get the pro version of ChatGPT, which begins at $20 per month or $200 per month, depending on what you want. The free version of Grok also limits you to Grok 4, not Grok 4.1, so you also need a subscription for Grok 4.1. A SuperGrok Subscription starts at $30 per month and goes up to $300 per month if you want more access.

This gives GPT-5.2 the advantage, because anyone who passed the first year knows, $20 is less than $30.

As for which one is more worth it, you’ll have to try both AI platforms for yourself and see which performs better for the type of work you want them to do. SKUs and price tags don’t mean much if one of them simply doesn’t work as well as the other for your particular use case.

Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, filed a lawsuit in April against OpenAI, alleging that it violated Ziff Davis’ copyrights in the training and operation of its AI systems.