More support for FSIS to share jurisdiction for animal abuse with states
The 2 -year petition of partisan animal in the food security and USDA inspection service (FSIS), calling for the Agency to share its federal competence on animal abuse with the application of state law, continues to gain the support of animal activists.
Murrieta, that–Based Ryther Law Group (RLG) and expand animal rights NOW (GAY), legal organizations specializing in cases affecting rights, position and well-being of animals-including farm animals-signed in petition 23-07 earlier this month.
“The staff of the FSIS inspection program regularly documents cases of cruelty to animals, such as repeated blows to amazement animals and a prolonged denial of water in extreme heat,” said the RLG / Earn letter. “However, state prosecutors almost never pursue criminal charges because they wrongly believe that the federal inspection is equivalent to exclusive competence.”
The letter of approval stipulates that petition 23-07 reveals that this false idea stems from the failure of the decades to clarify the position of the FSIS on preemption. He claims that:
1. Federal laws – such as the Federal Meat Inspection Act (IMF), Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (HMSA) and Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) – do not automatically prevent state officials from enforcing their laws on animals. In other words, states are not categorically pre-empted from the application of state-grinding laws.
2. The FSIs should work with state authorities by providing clear and rapid communications, such as concern to improve and support the application of the laws of cruelty to state animals.
RLG / EARN indicates that when state authorities and FSIS can act on the same evidence, potential offenders are faced with the combined threat of state and federal sanctions. “This two-track application regime makes a much stronger means of deterrence than one or the other system alone, ensuring more complete protection for farming animals,” he added.
Princess Bednarski, director of the cattle of the Houston Humane Society (HHS), tabled the first letter of 2025 in support of the animal partisan petition. The animal supporter based in Richmond, in VA, describes himself as a legal defense organization which creatively uses the legal system to disrupt the American animal agriculture industry. HHS is an animal refuge and a veterinary clinic in Houston, involved in the rehabilitation and treatment of animals, including certain farm animals.
The petition requests that the FSIs an opinion to transmit this:
1) State officials of the government of the State are not categorically preempted from the application of the anti-crop laws of the State by the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the law on human methods of slaughter or the law on the inspection of poultry products, and
2) FSIS personnel should cooperate with representatives of the State government in the application of state-grinding laws and improve clarity and communication frequency, such as concern to these officials.
In 2023 and 2024, many other animal protection organizations commented in support of the animal partisan petition. These included the National Animal Care and Control Association, the Clinic Clinic Animal Advocacy, the Veterinary Association for Farm Animal Welfare, Animal Welfare Institute and others.
Then he went without any other comment for almost a year. This has changed with the HHS ranking in Jine.
The HHS has said that the laws on the mistreatment of animals in Texas are “under application” due to the policy of the FSIS.
“We support the petition for a partisan animal and encourage the FSIs to publish a policy declaration specifying that those responsible for the application of state laws are not automatically pre-Emptée of the application of the anti-grinding laws of the state,” said the HHS letter. “We also urge the FSIs to work more closely with those responsible for the application of state laws to better apply these laws in cases involving farm animals.”
FSIS received the animal partisan petition on September 2, 2023. He was assigned to the FSIS Office of Policy and Program Development for Review. With the mentions in 2025, the petition generated comments of support over three years; However, nothing indicates that the FSI will approve it.
(To register for a free subscription to Food Safety News, Click here.)
