Rinse and repeat: US vaccine hearing on unpublished study debates same myths | US healthcare

A The hearing of the congress on Tuesday entitled “The way in which the corruption of science had an impact on the perception of the public and policies concerning vaccines” consisted largely in a debate on an unpublished study comparing chronic diseases in children who received vaccines with those who did not do so.

The study was carried out by Marcus Zervos by Henry Ford Health, completed in 2020 and was never submitted for publication, according to the testimony at the hearing. Senator Ron Johnson, president of the hearing subcommittee, and witness Aaron Siri, a lawyer who represented RFK JR and The non-profit anti-vaccination network has enlightened the consent network of action, both said that the study had not been submitted because the authors would lose their job if it would have been published.

Zervos and the other authors of the study were not present at the hearing. The study, which has never been evaluated by peers, is not currently available for the public as pre-printing or in any other form.

Henry Ford Health’s communications office did not respond to a request for in time for publication.

The only information that is currently accessible to the public on the study comes from the audience itself, including the testimony of witnesses and a brief trailer of a documentary from the informed consent action network. The trailer indicates that the study revealed that “among the non-vaccinated group, there was no cerebral dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problem, zero learning handicap, no intellectual disabled, zero tics and other psychological disability”.

The trailer also includes a clip by Donald Trump saying: “A few decades ago, one in 10,000 children had autism. Today, it’s one in 31.”

Witnesses on both sides of the debate at the hearing agreed that the study in question has found no link between vaccines and autism.

Jake Scott, an aggregated clinical professor of infectious diseases in Stanford – and the only doctor who witnessed during the hearing – had a different explanation of the reason why the study was not published.

In his testimony, Scott said that the study was “fundamentally imperfect”, adding that its basic problem was that “vaccinated children have twice monitoring and many more health care visits than non -vaccinated children”. More health care visits mean more opportunities to diagnose conditions such as ADHD.

Scott continued by explaining that “the study reports no case of ADHD among 1,000s of non -vaccinated children. How is it possible with a national prevalence at 11%? It is very unlikely, unless the conditions are not diagnosed. ” Scott noted that the study has also requested an increase of six to eight times in otitis in vaccinated children, but there is no plausible scientific explanation on the reasons for which vaccines would increase ear infections.

This observation complies with previous research showing that parents who did not vaccinate their children are also less likely to have their children treating for health problems in the medical system. Conditions that have not been diagnosed or processed would not have been presented in the study, which was based on medical records, according to the testimony of hearing.

Siri said that the study authors have carried out sensitivity analyzes to take into account the differences in medical care. These are not available for the public.

As a point of comparison, Scott referred to a Danish study published in July in Annals of Internal Medicine Who studied if infantile vaccines were linked to 50 different conditions, including many of the same conditions of the unpublished study, such as ADHD, autism, asthma, food allergies and eczema. The Danish study examined results in more than one million vaccinated children and 15,000 unvaccinated children, while the unpublished study examined 18,500 vaccinated children and 2,000 unvaccinated children, according to hearing testimonies.

The Danish study did not find any statistically significant increase in the risk for one of the conditions studied and that vaccinated children have experienced lower rates of certain conditions, such as ulcerative colitis.

Johnson and Siri expressed skepticism with regard to the Danish study, noting that the authors have not published the raw data identified they used for their conclusions. No data is available on the unpublished study.

Later in the hearing, the conversation turned to skepticism on vaccines in general and the COVVI-19 vaccine specifically.

Some graphics that Johnson shared has left critical information aside. For example, a line graphic that he introduced has shown precisely that the mortality rates of measles had already started to decline significantly before the introduction of vaccines in the 1960s, due to other factors such as improved sanitation, access to health care and nutrition, but the graph stops in 1960. After the introduction of vaccines and widely adopted, both the cases of Secouns and mortality decreased to zero.

Measles were actually eliminated in the United States in 2000, but cases reappeared when the adoption of the vaccine decreased. There were 35 measles epidemics in 2025, according to the CDC. At least two American children and an adult died of measles this year.

Scott, Stanford’s witness, had trouble answering certain questions based on parasitic facts. He was silent for a time when Johnson asked him, “You believed when Fauci told us that the [Covid] Would Arna Tir stay in the arm? There is no credible evidence that Faaci has ever said that.

Toby Rogers, a member of the Brownstone Institute whose study connecting vaccines and autism has been retracted said: “I believe that we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history”, referring to vaccines. In tweets now deleted, Rogers has called for audiences similar to Nuremberg trials for public health officials who promote vaccines.

When Senator Richard Blumenthal, classification member of the hearing subcommittee, asked if Rogers thinks that the COVVI-19 vaccine is comparable to the Holocaust, several public members have applauded.