Starmer told by Downing St staff that none of them briefed against Streeting, says No 10 – UK politics live | Politics
No 10 says Starmer has been told by Downing Street staff that none of them briefed against Streeting
Keir Starmer has been told by his No 10 staff that none of them were involved in briefing against Wes Streeting, Downing Street said this morning.
He has also told them that briefing against cabinet ministers is “completely unacceptable”.
At the lobby briefing this morning, the PM’s spokesperson said:
The prime minister has this morning gathered and spoken to his senior team in Downing Street. The prime minister reiterated the briefings against cabinet ministers are completely unacceptable, which has always been his position.
He underlined, as he told parliament yesterday, that he has never and would never sanction any such briefings against colleagues.
The PM said he had been assured that no No 10 staff briefed against ministers. The prime minister made abundantly clear the high standards that he expects from staff, and if anyone falls below those standards there will be consequences.
The meeting is understood to have taken place via a video call while Starmer was in north Wales, with some staff alongside him and others in Downing Street.
No leak inquiry has been launched, No 10 indicated. When the spokesperson was asked whether this meant Starmer was attempting to whitewash over the situation, he replied: “I don’t accept that.”
Asked why Starmer apologised to Wes Streeting if No 10 staff had not been involved in the briefing against him, the spokesperson said that the PM had apologised to Starmer “for the situation he found himself in”.
Key events
-
Starmer says he has been ‘assured no briefing against ministers done from No 10’
-
Starmer says he ‘of course’ has full confidence in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney
-
John Swinney tells MSPs he’s ‘open’ to idea of Scottish grooming gangs inquiry as Tories demand one
-
No 10 says Starmer has been told by Downing Street staff that none of them briefed against Streeting
-
PCCs criticise decision to abolish them without consultation, saying it will create ‘dangerous accountability vacuum’
-
‘No idea, don’t care’ – Streeting not bothered if No 10 briefer gets found, saying he wants to ‘leave silly soap opera behind’
-
Police Federation welcomes abolition of PCCs, saying they are ‘expensive experiment which has failed’
-
Tories describe abolition of PCCs as ‘minor tinkering around edges’
-
Home Office minister Sarah Jones claims gettting rid of PCCs will save £100m this parliament
-
Minister says police and crime commissioners will be abolished in 2028 because PCC system has failed
-
Can you trust anonymous briefings?
-
Police and crime commissioners to be abolished, government to announce
-
EU confirms talks will start next week on improved post-Brexit SPS deal with UK
-
12-month waits for hospital treatment down slightly, NHS England figures show, but still 2.4% of all waits
-
Waiting list figures for England fall slightly, after rising for past 3 months
-
UN experts criticise Palestine Action ban, saying calling groups terrorist ‘that are not genuinely so’ is authoritarian tactic
-
Scotland’s auditor general warns of multi-billion tax performance gap
-
Miliband defends small modular nuclear reactor choice for Wylfa in face of protests from US
-
Miliband says Starmer will sack No 10 person who briefed against Streeting if they’re identified
-
Miliband rules out standing to be next Labour leader, saying having done it before ‘best inoculation’ against wanting it
-
UK economy grew by just 0.1% in third quarter amid hit from JLR cyber-attack
-
Ed Miliband urges Labour to move on after Starmer apologises to Streeting for hostile briefings from No 10
Starmer says he has been ‘assured no briefing against ministers done from No 10’
Speaking to reporters in north Wales, where he was asked about the No 10 briefing row, Keir Starmer said:
First, let me be clear that any briefing against ministers is completely unacceptable. That is not a new position for me, it is a position I have adopted ever since I became prime minister. I have made it very clear to my team.
I have been talking to my team today. I have been assured that no briefing against ministers was done from No 10, but I have made it clear that I find it absolutely unacceptable …
I have been assured it didn’t come from Downing Street, but I have been equally clear that whether it is this case or any other, I intend to deal with it.
Asked if he would sack those responsible, Starmer replied:
I will absolutely deal with anybody responsible for briefing against ministers, cabinet ministers or any other ministers. I have always said that is the standard that I expect, and that is the standard that I will enforce.
Starmer says he ‘of course’ has full confidence in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney
Keir Starmer has said he “of course” retains full confidence in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, PA Media reports.
I will post the full quote shortly.
At PMQs yesterday Starmer dodged a question about whether he had full confidence in McSweeney, although No 10 subsequently said he did.
Some ministers and MPs want to see McSweeney sacked.
John Swinney tells MSPs he’s ‘open’ to idea of Scottish grooming gangs inquiry as Tories demand one
Libby Brooks
Libby Brooks is the Guardian’s Scotland correspondent.
Pressure on the Scottish government to set up its own grooming gangs inquiry continues, with Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay leading on the issue at first minister’s questions today.
Findlay revealed that an alleged victim of a grooming gang in Glasgow, “Taylor”, had written to John Swinney asking him to launch an inquiry.
Momentum is growing around a Scotland-specific inquiry, with Labour MP Joani Reid has accused the SNP of “establishment cover-up” after they blocked Scottish attempts to introduce an amendment to criminal justice reforms that would have required a new victims commissioner to carry out research related to group-based child exploitation in Scotland.
Pressed on this by Findlay today, Swinney said it was “a distortion” to say a grooming inquiry was put before parliament and rejected, pointing out that the Tory amendment would only require a report from an as yet unappointed commissioner.
Swinney said his government “remains open to the question of an inquiry” but that meanwhile the police and the National Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Strategic Group were continuing to address historic and current allegations.
No 10 says Starmer has been told by Downing Street staff that none of them briefed against Streeting
Keir Starmer has been told by his No 10 staff that none of them were involved in briefing against Wes Streeting, Downing Street said this morning.
He has also told them that briefing against cabinet ministers is “completely unacceptable”.
At the lobby briefing this morning, the PM’s spokesperson said:
The prime minister has this morning gathered and spoken to his senior team in Downing Street. The prime minister reiterated the briefings against cabinet ministers are completely unacceptable, which has always been his position.
He underlined, as he told parliament yesterday, that he has never and would never sanction any such briefings against colleagues.
The PM said he had been assured that no No 10 staff briefed against ministers. The prime minister made abundantly clear the high standards that he expects from staff, and if anyone falls below those standards there will be consequences.
The meeting is understood to have taken place via a video call while Starmer was in north Wales, with some staff alongside him and others in Downing Street.
No leak inquiry has been launched, No 10 indicated. When the spokesperson was asked whether this meant Starmer was attempting to whitewash over the situation, he replied: “I don’t accept that.”
Asked why Starmer apologised to Wes Streeting if No 10 staff had not been involved in the briefing against him, the spokesperson said that the PM had apologised to Starmer “for the situation he found himself in”.
PCCs criticise decision to abolish them without consultation, saying it will create ‘dangerous accountability vacuum’
The Association of Police and Crime Commissioners has criticised the government for abolishing PCCs without consultation. It says this will create “a dangerous accountability vacuum”.
In a statement, the APCC chair, Emily Spurrell, the Labour PCC for Merseyside, said:
On behalf of our communities we are deeply disappointed by this decision and the lack of engagement with us.
For more than a decade, directly elected police and crime commissioners have transformed policing accountability and delivered essential support services for victims of crime. Having a single, visible local leader – answerable to the public – has improved scrutiny and transparency, ensuring policing delivers on the issues that matter most to local communities.
Abolishing PCCs now, without any consultation, as policing faces a crisis of public trust and confidence and as it is about to be handed a much stronger national centre, risks creating a dangerous accountability vacuum.
Back in the Commons Ben Maguire, a Liberal Democrat spokesperson, welcomed the abolition of PCCs, describing them as a “failed Tory experiment”. He said:
This was a failed Tory experiment which cost taxpayers dearly. The minister is right to point out the countless flaws in the overly politicised PCC model, which has diverted much-needed funding away from frontline and community policing. They cost the public millions in council tax every year, yet the impact on their local communities has been negligible.
But Maguire said the Lib Dems were not in favour of giving PCC powers to mayors, whom he described as “single individuals with dubious democratic mandates and little scrutiny or accountability”. He said it would be better for police and crime boards to take over.
Sarah Jones, the policing minister, thanked Maguire for “his robust attack on a policy that his own party introduced as part of the coalition in 2010”.
‘No idea, don’t care’ – Streeting not bothered if No 10 briefer gets found, saying he wants to ‘leave silly soap opera behind’
Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has said that he doesn’t know and doesn’t care whether Keir Starmer is trying to identify the No 10 figure briefing against him.
Speaking to PA Media on a visit in Liverpool, Streeting made it clear that he no longer wanted to talk about the No 10 briefing yesterday, that dominated the discussion at PMQs yesterday.
He said he wanted to focus on the news that NHS waiting lists are falling. (See 10.01am.)
Asked about the row, Streeting said:
I have no intention of revisiting yesterday’s events. That’s yesterday’s news and it’s Westminster bubble stuff that doesn’t mean anything to anyone.
I don’t think voters give two monkeys about what on earth is going on in the sort of Westminster village soap opera. What they do care about is, if they’re on an NHS waiting list, are we getting them down?
Asked about the apology he received from Keir Starmer, Streeting said:
One of the great things about being here in the North West today is you can leave all that silly Westminster soap opera stuff behind.
Asked if Starmer was investigating who was responsible for the No 10 briefing against him, Streeting said: “No idea, don’t care.”
And asked about the future of Morgan McSweeney, Starmer’s chief of staff, whom some ministers want to see sacked as a result of the briefing, Streeting said:
I’m sure that Morgan McSweeney, Keir Starmer and everyone else is absolutely delighted with the news today that NHS waiting lists are falling.
Police Federation welcomes abolition of PCCs, saying they are ‘expensive experiment which has failed’
The Police Federation of England and Wales, which represents police officers up to the rank of chief inspector, has welcomed the abolition of PCCs.
In a statement, its national chair Tiff Lynch said:
We welcome this announcement and look forward to helping shape whatever accountability structures replace directly-elected police and crime commissioners.
PCCs were an expensive experiment which has failed. The tens of millions of pounds they cost should instead be a down-payment for the sort of policing service this country and its police officers deserve.
Tories describe abolition of PCCs as ‘minor tinkering around edges’
Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, responded to Jones on behalf of the Conservative party. He claimed that the government was failing on police and crime and he said this measure was just “minor tinkering around the edges”.
He said he did not accept that mayors were more effective than PCCs. He said that Sadiq Khan, who has London mayor is the PCC for the capital, was “the worst PCC in the country” because of the way knife crime has been rising.
In response, Jones said she could not work out whether the Tories were in favour of the announcement or against it.
UPDATE: Philp said:
The minister mentioned at the beginning the government’s plans to bring forward a police reform white paper, announced, from memory, about a year ago.
But there hasn’t been a single sniff of that white paper since then. Perhaps she can tell us when we can expect it and why the government is so bereft of ideas, it has taken a year or more to publish that white paper.
Now, today’s statement about police and crime commissioners represents, in my view, a tinkering around the edges from a government which is failing on crime and policing.
If you like, it is simply rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic, because this government is failing, police numbers are falling – they fell by 1,300 during Labour’s first year in office on a like-for-like March-to-March comparison – and not only are police numbers falling, they are continuing to fall and will drop even more this year.
Home Office minister Sarah Jones claims gettting rid of PCCs will save £100m this parliament
Jones said that getting rid of PCCs would save £100m this parliament by moving to the new system.
And, once delivered, the change would save the Home Office around £20m a year, she said. She said that would pay for an extra 320 extra police constables.
Jones ended her statement by saying that, although she was criticising the PCC system, she was not criticising the PCCs themselves.
She said they had done, and continue to do, important work.
Jones said that, where possible, the goverment would transfer the responsibilities of PCCs in England to mayors.
Where that was not possible, it would create policing and crime boards to oversee police forces until other measures are in place, she said.
She acknowledged there are no metro mayors in Wales. She said the government would work with the government in Wales to find alternative arrangements for PCCs there.
Minister says police and crime commissioners will be abolished in 2028 because PCC system has failed
Jones says Yvette Cooper promised a white paper on police reforms when she was home secretary.
Ahead of the publication of the white paper, the government is today announcing the abolition of police and crime commissioner (PCCs), she says.
She says PCCs have been in place since November 2012.
She says accountability is important in public services.
But she says the PCC system has failed.
Whilst the role of PCCs has evolved over time to include responsibility for commissioning services for victims, driving local partnerships and in some areas, responsibilities for firefighters, the model has failed to live up to expectations.
It has not delivered what it was set up to achieve.
Public understanding or engagement with crime commissioners remains low.
Despite efforts to raise that profile, less than a quarter of voters turned out to vote for them in the 2024 elections, and two in five people are unaware that PCCs even exist …
The reality is that the PCC model has weakened local police accountability and has had perverse impacts on the recruitment of chief constables.
They have failed to inspire confidence in local people, in stark contrast to the mayoral model, which has clearly been ultimately more successful.
Referring to the former PM who was home secretary in 2012 when PCCs were introduced, Jones says:
The Theresa may model has not worked.
She says the government wants to transfer policing functions to mayors in England. This was set out in the English devolution white paper, she says.
She says the government has decided to scrap PCCs when their current term of office in 2028.
Sarah Jones, the policing minister, is making a statement to MPs.
She starts by expressing her sadness at the death of Helen Newlove, the victims commissioner.
Can you trust anonymous briefings?
A reader asks:
Hi Andrew. I’m interested in how these anonymous briefings from No 10 work? Are they to a group, to an individual, in person, or via email or social media? What’s in place to prevent a journalist or media organisation from just making something up? Thanks…
That is a reasonable question. People are understandably suspicious when they read/watch that are just attributed to “sources”, not official spokespeople, or actual individuals.
At Westminster most of what gets reported is based on what gets said on the record. No 10 has daily, group briefings by an on-the-record spokesperson.
But – as in other areas of reporting – there are people happy to talk to journalists, on the basis that what they say will be reported, but that they won’t be identified. The reporter will either quote a source without naming them (sometimes referred to as getting information ‘on background’) or just use the information without any attribution at all, ‘it is understood etc’ (sometime referred to as getting information ‘on deep background’).
A lot of people dislike this system because it removes accountability. To a large extent, it does. But without this sort of reporting, a lot of information would never come to light. Boris Johnson might still be prime minister if it had not been for the Partygate scandal that only emerged t because people spoke to journalists on background or deep background.
Responsible journalists writing stories like this put a lot of effort into a) making sure that their sources are credible (so they are not presenting a junior dogsbody as a ‘senior source’) and b) taking care not misrepresent people (so that a casual remark does not get written up a serious statement of intent).
These briefings tend to happen one-to-one, in person, on the phone, or on WhatsApp. They are not group briefings. But, if senior people are putting out a message, they will be saying the same or similar things to reporters from different news organisations, as was happening in Downing Street earlier this week.
You ask what is in place to stop journalists just making it up. Nothing, I’m afraid. But journalists care about their reputations, and stories that are false, or exaggerated, normally get exposed as such very quickly. They also don’t get followed up.
Ultimately, you have to decide who you can trust. The Guardian No 10 briefing story on Tuesday was written by Pippa Crerar (who also broke the original Boris Johnson Partygate story), it has been followed up by everyone, and it has not been denied. If you don’t trust her reporting, you’d be very foolish.
Police and crime commissioners to be abolished, government to announce
The controversial system of police and crime commissioners is to be abolished by the government, Vikram Dodd reports.
Sarah Jones, the policing minister, is due to make a ministerial statement in the Commons on “police reform” and so presumably the formal announcement will come then.
EU confirms talks will start next week on improved post-Brexit SPS deal with UK
The UK and the EU will next week will begin formal talks on two issues that would deepen post-Brexit relations.
Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, confirmed the move in a statement last night issued after she had what she called “a good call” with Keir Starmer.
The negotiations, which will build on an outline reset deal agreed at a summit in May, will cover two issues: a proposed sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) deal, and an emissions trading systems (ETS) linking agreement.
According to the Cabinet Office, an SPS deal with the EU “could add up to £5.1bn a year to our economy in the long run, increase the volume of UK exports of major agricultural commodities to the EU by 16%, and increase imports from the EU by 8%”.
It would save agri-food exporters from having to pay for expensive certificates and checks when they export to the EU.
And an ETS linking agreement would “save UK industry from paying the EU’s carbon border tax (CBAM) on £7bn worth of UK exports, remove regulatory barriers in sectors like CO2 storage, and provide a cheaper path to net zero – with a larger and more stable carbon market”, the Cabinet Office says. It says this could add almost £4bn a year to the economy in the long run.
Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister, said:
This is welcome progress – we can now start formal talks on deals that will help keep food costs down and slash red tape.
