The New York Times has done so much for Trump—but it’s never enough
After months of capitulation of the consumer media towards President Donald Trump and his administration, Trump has put a legal action of $ 15 billion Monday evening against the New York Times.
In His costumewho absurd his electoral victory and his status as A successful “author”, Trump accuses the times of “smear” by reporting with precision his statements and actions.
“Times is a full -growing mouthpiece of the Democratic Party,” said Trump falsely. The declaration ignores the decades of the time Right propaganda supply and raising attacks on the Democratic Party and the Left.
In a declaration The Times said that Trump’s prosecution “has no merit” and “is an attempt to suffocate and discourage independent relationships”.
Trump’s pursuit against the Times shows that even when the paper leans back for him, he will always be resentful of precise reporting. Since he was sworn in for a second term, there have been several cases of false obsequious and downright reports of Times in favor of Trump.
THE referred document In the current era as “the age of Trump” in June, a month after taking His pretension–who went against his whole story as a political figure– that it would withdraw support from the increases in taxes on the rich as an honest statement.
In the moment may be the most dishonest for the “file of the file” in the second term of Trump, the February Times depicts a black voter Support Trump as simply a “worker to start artificial intelligence”, without informing readers that the supporter is also the director of communications for young Houston Republicans.
Admittedly, the Times reported precisely on many Trump scandals, corruption and fanaticism, but the cover of the newspaper –directed by star journalist Maggie Haberman–was friendly with Trump and often regurgus his lies regurgus without calling him. In his reports on Trump, Haberman moved away from the note to the readers when he clearly lied, like this 2018 report It said rather Trump “repeatedly refused to accept a number of apparently agreed facts. ” In A story of 2020Instead of addressing Trump’s racism directly, Haberman’s reports mentioned That he was only “attaching the fear and the white resentment”.
Trump’s costume is only the last of a legal action dam against the media. He continued The monks register for the conduct of polls, He continued Facebook Parent Meta for having prohibited his account after prompting violence, and he continued Fox The owner Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal For reporting on his ties with the sex offender condemned Jeffrey Epstein, among others.
Many of these points of sale settled with Trump, even after the legal experts have clearly indicated that the combinations lacked merit and were vehicles for extortion and corruption payments. The parent of CBS News Paramount is the subject of an investigation by Congress Democrats after the Trump administration Approved a merger Shortly after, Paramount decided to adjust his costume. ABC News Parent Disney Also cut a check to Trump on a specious complaint.
Related | Apparently, the Washington Post cannot call Kirk’s racism
Simultaneously, points of sale like the Washington Post under the Trump Jeff Bezos support pivoted pro-Trump. The newspaper recently dismissed an opinion columnist who criticized Charlie Kirk’s racist opinions after being murdered.
The consumer media apparently believed that Trump would back up after having curry the favor with him and reimbursed him. Trump has clearly not accepted this agreement and he always targets them for telling the truth.
