CRISPR live-cell imaging reveals chromatin dynamics and enhancer interactions at multiple non-repetitive loci
Zheng, H. & Xie, W. The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 535–550 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. & Zhang, Y. Role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in development. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 89, 135–158 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schmitt, A. D., Hu, M. & Ren, B. Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 743–755 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dekker, J. et al. The 4D nucleome project. Nature 549, 219–226 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yu, M. & Ren, B. The three-dimensional organization of mammalian genomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 265–289 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. Asymmetric distribution of parental H3K9me3 in S phase silences L1 elements. Nature 623, 643–651 (2023).
Google Scholar
Emerson, D. J. et al. Cohesin-mediated loop anchors confine the locations of human replication origins. Nature 606, 812–819 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dekker, J. et al. Spatial and temporal organization of the genome: current state and future aims of the 4D nucleome project. Mol. Cell 83, 2624–2640 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Fork coupling directs DNA replication elongation and termination. Science 383, 1215–1222 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, D. et al. Chromatin accessibility dynamics during iPSC reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 21, 819–833.e6 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wan, Y. et al. Dynamic imaging of nascent RNA reveals general principles of transcription dynamics and stochastic splice site selection. Cell 184, 2878–2895.e20 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wen, X. et al. Single-cell multiplex chromatin and RNA interactions in ageing human brain. Nature 628, 648–656 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lupianez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R. J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
Google Scholar
Schoenfelder, S. & Fraser, P. Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 437–455 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, D. et al. Reprogramming transcription by distinct classes of enhancers functionally defined by eRNA. Nature 474, 390–394 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, M. & Wu, Q. Systematic functional characterization of antisense eRNA of protocadherin α composite enhancer. Genes Dev. 35, 1383–1394 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing. Genome Biol. 11, R22 (2010).
Google Scholar
Beagrie, R. A. et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature 543, 519–524 (2017).
Google Scholar
Beagrie, R. A. et al. Multiplex-GAM: genome-wide identification of chromatin contacts yields insights overlooked by Hi-C. Nat. Methods 20, 1037–1047 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mirny, L. A. & Solovei, I. Keeping chromatin in the loop(s). Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 439–440 (2021).
Google Scholar
Boettiger, A. N. et al. Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states. Nature 529, 418–422 (2016).
Google Scholar
Su, J. H., Zheng, P., Kinrot, S. S., Bintu, B. & Zhuang, X. Genome-scale imaging of the 3D organization and transcriptional activity of chromatin. Cell 182, 1641–1659.e26 (2020).
Google Scholar
Takei, Y. et al. Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei. Nature 590, 344–350 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, T. & Wang, S. Image-based 3D genomics through chromatin tracing. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 4, 76 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pownall, M. E. et al. Chromatin expansion microscopy reveals nanoscale organization of transcription and chromatin. Science 381, 92–100 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gabriele, M. et al. Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging. Science 376, 496–501 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. H. & Hansen, A. S. Enhancer selectivity in space and time: from enhancer−promoter interactions to promoter activation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 574–591 (2024).
Google Scholar
Brückner, D. B., Chen, H. T., Barinov, L., Zoller, B. & Gregor, T. Stochastic motion and transcriptional dynamics of pairs of distal DNA loci on a compacted chromosome. Science 380, 1357–1362 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alexander, J. M. et al. Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity. eLife 8, e41769 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, H. T. et al. Dynamic interplay between enhancer−promoter topology and gene activity. Nat. Genet. 50, 1296–1303 (2018).
Google Scholar
Janicki, S. M. et al. From silencing to gene expression: real-time analysis in single cells. Cell 116, 683–698 (2004).
Google Scholar
Masui, O. et al. Live-cell chromosome dynamics and outcome of X chromosome pairing events during ES cell differentiation. Cell 145, 447–458 (2011).
Google Scholar
Xu, H. et al. TriTag: an integrative tool to correlate chromatin dynamics and gene expression in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 13013–13014 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, B. et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155, 1479–1491 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. CRISPR-mediated live imaging of genome editing and transcription. Science 365, 1301–1305 (2019).
Google Scholar
Qin, P. et al. Live cell imaging of low- and non-repetitive chromosome loci using CRISPR−Cas9. Nat. Commun. 8, 14725 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gu, B. et al. Transcription-coupled changes in nuclear mobility of mammalian cis-regulatory elements. Science 359, 1050–1055 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lyu, X. Y. et al. CRISPR FISHer enables high-sensitivity imaging of nonrepetitive DNA in living cells through phase separation-mediated signal amplification. Cell Res. 32, 969–981 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. et al. CRISPR-array-mediated imaging of non-repetitive and multiplex genomic loci in living cells. Nat. Methods 21, 1646–1657 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ma, H. et al. Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 528–530 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cheng, A. W. et al. Casilio: a versatile CRISPR-Cas9-Pumilio hybrid for gene regulation and genomic labeling. Cell Res. 26, 254–257 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ma, H. et al. CRISPR-Sirius: RNA scaffolds for signal amplification in genome imaging. Nat. Methods 15, 928–931 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mao, S., Ying, Y., Wu, X., Krueger, C. J. & Chen, A. K. CRISPR/dual-FRET molecular beacon for sensitive live-cell imaging of non-repetitive genomic loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e131 (2019).
Google Scholar
Peng, Q. et al. Engineering inducible biomolecular assemblies for genome imaging and manipulation in living cells. Nat. Commun. 13, 7933 (2022).
Google Scholar
Clow, P. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated multiplexed live cell imaging of nonrepetitive genomic loci with one guide RNA per locus. Nat. Commun. 13, 1871 (2022).
Google Scholar
Geng, Y. T. & Pertsinidis, A. Simple and versatile imaging of genomic loci in live mammalian cells and early pre-implantation embryos using CAS-LiveFISH. Sci. Rep. 11, 12220 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Fluorogenic CRISPR for genomic DNA imaging. Nat. Commun. 15, 934 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Lu, G., Duan, J., Liu, W. & Zhang, Y. Comparison and optimization of CRISPR/dCas9/gRNA genome-labeling systems for live cell imaging. Genome Biol. 19, 39 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mao, S., Wu, R., Luo, W., Qin, J. & Chen, A. K. Spuriously transcribed RNAs from CRISPR-sgRNA expression plasmids scaffold biomolecular condensate formation and hamper accurate genomic imaging. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf192 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chen, B. et al. Expanding the CRISPR imaging toolset with Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 for simultaneous imaging of multiple genomic loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e75 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ge, X. et al. Outward-oriented sites within clustered CTCF boundaries are key for intra-TAD chromatin interactions and gene regulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 8101 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lv, X. et al. Patterned cPCDH expression regulates the fine organization of the neocortex. Nature 612, 503–511 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wu, Q. & Maniatis, T. A striking organization of a large family of human neural cadherin-like cell adhesion genes. Cell 97, 779–790 (1999).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Hu, Y. & Fang, X. Site-specific covalent labeling of large RNAs with nanoparticles empowered by expanded genetic alphabet transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22823–22832 (2020).
Google Scholar
Niu, X. et al. Pseudoknot length modulates the folding, conformational dynamics, and robustness of Xrn1 resistance of flaviviral xrRNAs. Nat. Commun. 12, 6417 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Posttranscriptional site-directed spin labeling of large RNAs with an unnatural base pair system under non-denaturing conditions. Chem. Sci. 11, 9655–9664 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, L. J. et al. Natural-like replication of an unnatural base pair for the expansion of the genetic alphabet and biotechnology applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 826–829 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lee, K. H., Hamashima, K., Kimoto, M. & Hirao, I. Genetic alphabet expansion biotechnology by creating unnatural base pairs. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 51, 8–15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Betz, K. et al. KlenTaq polymerase replicates unnatural base pairs by inducing a Watson-Crick geometry. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 612–614 (2012).
Google Scholar
Oh, J. et al. Transcriptional processing of an unnatural base pair by eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 906–914 (2021).
Google Scholar
Korolev, S. & Gagnon, K. SpCas9 with sgRNA and target DNA. RCSB Protein Data Bank. https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb8G1I/pdb (2023).
Atlasi, Y. & Stunnenberg, H. G. The interplay of epigenetic marks during stem cell differentiation and development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 643–658 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. Q. et al. Super-resolution imaging of higher-order chromatin structures at different epigenomic states in single mammalian cells. Cell Rep. 24, 873–882 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ricci, M. A., Manzo, C., García-Parajo, M. F., Lakadamyali, M. & Cosma, M. P. Chromatin fibers are formed by heterogeneous groups of nucleosomes in vivo. Cell 160, 1145–1158 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nozaki, T. et al. Condensed but liquid-like domain organization of active chromatin regions in living human cells. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf1488 (2023).
Google Scholar
Saxton, M. N., Morisaki, T., Krapf, D., Kimura, H. & Stasevich, T. J. Live-cell imaging uncovers the relationship between histone acetylation, transcription initiation, and nucleosome mobility. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh4819 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nagashima, R. et al. Single nucleosome imaging reveals loose genome chromatin networks via active RNA polymerase II. J. Cell Biol. 218, 1511–1530 (2019).
Google Scholar
Feng, Y. et al. Simultaneous epigenetic perturbation and genome imaging reveal distinct roles of H3K9me3 in chromatin architecture and transcription. Genome Biol. 21, 296 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lasko, L. M. et al. Discovery of a selective catalytic p300/CBP inhibitor that targets lineage-specific tumours. Nature 550, 128–132 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vigushin, D. M. et al. Trichostatin A is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity against breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 971–976 (2001).
Google Scholar
Payer, B. & Lee, J. T. X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 733–772 (2008).
Google Scholar
Xie, G. J. et al. MLL3/MLL4 methyltransferase activities control early embryonic development and embryonic stem cell differentiation in a lineage-selective manner. Nat. Genet. 55, 693–705 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alver, B. H. et al. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex is required for maintenance of lineage specific enhancers. Nat. Commun. 8, 14648 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lex, R. K. et al. GLI transcriptional repression is inert prior to Hedgehog pathway activation. Nat. Commun. 13, 808 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kraushaar, D. C. et al. Genome-wide incorporation dynamics reveal distinct categories of turnover for the histone variant H3.3. Genome Biol. 14, R121 (2013).
Google Scholar
Huang, X., Bashkenova, N., Yang, J. H., Li, D. & Wang, J. L. ZFP281 recruits polycomb repressive complex 2 to restrict extraembryonic endoderm potential in safeguarding embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Protein Cell 12, 213–219 (2021); erratum 12, 511–513 (2021).
Xie, W. H. et al. RNF40 regulates gene expression in an epigenetic context-dependent manner. Genome Biol. 18, 32 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pham, P. D. et al. Transcriptional network governing extraembryonic endoderm cell fate choice. Dev. Biol. 502, 20–37 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kaemena, D. F. et al. B1 SINE-binding ZFP266 impedes mouse iPSC generation through suppression of chromatin opening mediated by reprogramming factors. Nat. Commun. 14, 488 (2023).
Google Scholar
Raccaud, M. et al. Mitotic chromosome binding predicts transcription factor properties in interphase. Nat. Commun. 10, 487 (2019).
Google Scholar
Du, Z. H. et al. Stepwise de novo establishment of inactive X chromosome architecture in early development. Nat. Genet. 56, 2185–2198 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cloutier, M., Harris, C., Gayen, S., Maclary, E. & Kalantry, S. Experimental analysis of imprinted mouse X-chromosome inactivation. Methods Mol. Biol. 1861, 177–203 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cox, G. & Sheppard, C. J. R. Practical limits of resolution in confocal and non-linear microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 63, 18–22 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kehayova, P., Monahan, K., Chen, W. S. & Maniatis, T. Regulatory elements required for the activation and repression of the protocadherin-α gene cluster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17195–17200 (2011).
Google Scholar
Guo, Y. et al. CTCF/cohesin-mediated DNA looping is required for protocadherin α promoter choice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21081–21086 (2012).
Google Scholar
Monahan, K. et al. Role of CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) and cohesin in the generation of single-cell diversity of Protocadherin-α gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9125–9130 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. F. et al. Chemical-induced phase transition and global conformational reorganization of chromatin. Nat. Commun. 14, 5556 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ye, C. Y. et al. DRUG-seq for miniaturized high-throughput transcriptome profiling in drug discovery. Nat. Commun. 9, 4307 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tak, Y. E. et al. Augmenting and directing long-range CRISPR-mediated activation in human cells. Nat. Methods 18, 1075–1081 (2021).
Google Scholar
Morgan, S. L. et al. Manipulation of nuclear architecture through CRISPR-mediated chromosomal looping. Nat. Commun. 8, 15993 (2017).
Google Scholar
Furlan, G. et al. The Ftx noncoding locus controls X chromosome inactivation independently of its RNA products. Mol. Cell 70, 462–472 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bal, E. et al. Super-enhancer hypermutation alters oncogene expression in B cell lymphoma. Nature 607, 808–815 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science 361, eaar3958 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cho, W. K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science 361, 412–415 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lovén, J. et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell 153, 320–334 (2013).
Google Scholar
Delmore, J. E. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell 146, 904–917 (2011).
Google Scholar
Linares-Saldana, R. et al. BRD4 orchestrates genome folding to promote neural crest differentiation. Nat. Genet. 53, 1480–1492 (2021).
Google Scholar
Crump, N. T. et al. BET inhibition disrupts transcription but retains enhancer-promoter contact. Nat. Commun. 12, 223 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xiang, J. et al. Human colorectal cancer-specific CCAT1-L lncRNA regulates long-range chromatin interactions at the MYC locus. Cell Res. 24, 513–531 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cai, Z. K. et al. RIC-seq for global in situ profiling of RNA−RNA spatial interactions. Nature 582, 432–437 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. High-resolution dynamic imaging of chromatin DNA communication using Oligo-LiveFISH. Cell 188, 3310–3328.e27 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wan, X. et al. SiCLAT: simultaneous imaging of chromatin loops and active transcription in living cells. Genome Biol. 26, 1 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ochiai, H., Sugawara, T. & Yamamoto, T. Simultaneous live imaging of the transcription and nuclear position of specific genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e127 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lengner, C. J. et al. Primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts: a model of mesenchymal cartilage formation. J. Cell. Physiol. 200, 327–333 (2004).
Google Scholar
Jinek, M. et al. Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science 343, 1247997 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Beliveau, B. J. et al. Versatile design and synthesis platform for visualizing genomes with Oligopaint FISH probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21301–21306 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. CRISPR-mediated programmable 3D genome positioning and nuclear organization. Cell 175, 1405–1417.e14 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zou, Z., Ohta, T., Miura, F. & Oki, S. ChIP-Atlas 2021 update: a data-mining suite for exploring epigenomic landscapes by fully integrating ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq and Bisulfite-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W175–W182 (2022).
Google Scholar
