Supreme Court Justices Didn’t Sign Affidavits In Leak Probe

Each employee of the Supreme Court who had access to Abortion decision project that has been disclosed Before his official announcement signed affidavits under the truancy that they were not behind the disclosure.

Each employee except for the nine judges, that is to say.

The revelation that the judges were not invited or were to sign an affidavit who came on Friday, one day after the high office of the Marshal of the American court published a report in which he declared that his investigators had been Impossible to identify the culprit Behind the flight of the opinion of the majority of judge Samuel Alito Dobbs c. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in Politico in May.

“During the investigation, I spoke to each of the judges, several on several occasions,” said Marshal Gail A. Curley statement Liberated by the court on Friday. “The judges have actively cooperated in this iterative process, asking questions and answering mine. I followed all the credible tracks, which were not involved in judges or their spouses.

“On this basis, I did not think it was necessary to ask the judges to sign sworn affidavits,” said Curley.

In the report published Thursday, the Marshal said that 126 interviews had been conducted with 97 employees of the court as part of the flight hunting. The Marshal said that “the investigation focused on court staff – temporary (clerics) and permanent employees – who had or had access to the opinion project.”

At the end of the initial interviews, each employee was invited to sign an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that they were not behind the flight. “If the investigators later determine that a personnel lied to the investigators, these staff members would be subject to prosecution for a false declaration,” wrote Marshal.