Trump Firing Top Prosecutor for Failing to Invent Fake Crimes by Foes

Yes, Trump does affirm that James is guilty of crimes and that he is innocent. And its propagandists too. “She is guilty of multiple major criminal violations”, Stephen Miller recently billed, calling James “corrupt” and “shamelessly”. (We imagine that as the facts refused to cooperate, Miller was on the phone, shouting wildly that Siebert had Better to bring a prosecution or.)

But in the end, what Trump and Miller really do is to try to establish ethics that all prosecution is only a power struggle, that the mere metric of guilt against innocence which has a force is established by which wins the elections (by all the necessary means) and, by extension, which ready to continue who.

The James affair reveals it clearly. James’ office actually did the job to build a business against Trump and above all succeeded, guaranteeing a verdict (if not a penalty) which is found. Trump and Miller thought they could simply order James’ prosecution in response and get it automatically. Now that the facts do not play, they just look for a new prosecutor who will carry a file against her despite everything.