Trump’s Tylenol announcement incurs furious backlash: ‘This is yet more utter rubbish’ | Donald Trump

MEudic professionals, pregnant people and readers with a relationship with autism are furious at the Trump administration’s announcement Monday involving Tylenol and its presumed link with autism.

In the hours following the Guardian’s publication, a call for answers to the announcement, hundreds sent their thoughts. Many of these people noted that the announcement had fascist nuances and was largely disconnected from the realities of science and experience of being pregnant. A certain number of respondents suggested that this announcement was a ploy in bad faith to distract voters from the questions that Trump wishes to withdraw from the speech.

“Can tylenol relieve Epstein’s pain?” wondered a player based in Georgia that preferred to remain anonymous.

A reader based in Shropshire who chose to be anonymous said: “Like many who leaves Trump’s mouth, you have to consider the timing and the purpose of its absolute nonsense. Trump is like a criminal fleeing the scene, lowering the furniture to create obstacles for his pursuers. ”

Dorian, a retired therapist based in New Orleans, also underlined the intention of the announcement.

“I think that is another deplorable red herring to divert attention from what could lead to a dismissal: the truth about Epstein. Until now, it seems to work,” wrote Dorian.

Several readers criticized the Guardian for having even pursued the conversation. Jon of Dorset wrote: “Since my wife does not take paracetamol and we have two autistic children, it is still more absolute waste from Trump and Al, designed to divert the attention of Epstein files”, adding: “You are also an accomplice by broadcasting these garbage”.

Scientists and health professionals who responded said they were angry with the lack of scientific foundations for these claims.

“The association is completely fallacious,” said Dr. Paul Kiff, a medical research critic based in Suffolk, adding that Trump did not understand the real results of the research.

A reader based in Colorado who worked as a receptionist in a long -term care establishment said that they “had the president giving medical advice which are during the play by experts in this field, and think that it should be deleted due to its lack of knowledge of all” women “.”

“It is a question of control. It is a question of conditioning the followers to believe that everything he does is the right thing,” wrote Trish, a nurse based in North Carolina.

Some pregnant readers were also frustrated by the announcement, given that their pain management and disease options are already extremely limited.

An anonymous reader from Virginie wrote: “When I was pregnant, I certainly took acetaminophen. The growth of a human in you is a little painful and dear leaders. My two children have no signs of autism. Perhaps learning to read scientific journals instead of Facebook publications? ”

“I am 35 weeks pregnant and currently in the midst of a terrible cold,” wrote Morven, a 37 -year -old man in Warwickshire. “The only thing that the pharmacy is securely authorized to recommend is paracetamol … To say” do not take it, there is no disadvantage “is not only a harmful way of autism and its causes; he also cheerfully ignores the health care options of pregnancy. Why am I not surprised by that of Trump?”

Others stressed that the announcement was in accordance with the largest program of the 2025 project to exercise more control over women’s bodies. Other policies that align on this program include the classification of common contraceptives by the State Department as a “abortion”, which means that they end rather than prevent pregnancies, directly contradicting science from the way these methods work.

Sophie, a 34 -year -old pregnant woman based in the Hertfordshire, said that she was “disgusted by disinformation and misogynist account distributed by Trump and her diet. It is a slippery slope towards the reality of the history of the servant.”

An anonymous reader based in eastern London added that Trump’s objective is “more coercion and control and inducing a feeling of helplessness and suspicion of scientific experts … Mistrust towards sciences / experts is an autocratic trademark. All power must converge the leader. “

Adolf Hitler of Germany, Benito Mussolini of Italy and Francisco Franco of Spain have systematically mixed systematically in the scientific consensus of their day to transmit politically motivated theories politically motivated by racial purity and eugenics.

Several readers who are themselves autistic or have an autistic sank off offense to underline how painful it is to hear your own condition discussed as if it were to be avoided at all costs.

A reader based in Surrey with an autistic little child wrote: “I am repelled by the non-scientific and menagus arguments emanating from the White House and Kennedy supremely unskilled”, adding that neurodiversity should be celebrated, not eradicated.

“Many people on the spectrum are smart, creative and” left field “thinkers,” she wrote. “They don’t need a remedy. Rejecting neurodivergence in its many forms seems closely linked to fascist thought. ”

An autistic reader based in the United Kingdom wrote: “I’m fed up with constant negativity and suggestion according to which autism is horrible, debilitating, a tragedy, etc.” Adding: “All this balustrade against autism and all these conspiracy theories on the causes.