Unlocking gene regulatory networks for crop resilience and sustainable agriculture
Long, T. A., Brady, S. M. & Benfey, P. N. Systems approaches to identifying gene regulatory networks in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 81–103 (2008).
Google Scholar
Karlebach, G. & Shamir, R. Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 770–780 (2008).
Google Scholar
Chai, L. E. et al. A review on the computational approaches for gene regulatory network construction. Comput. Biol. Med. 48, 55–65 (2014).
Google Scholar
Delgado, F. M. & Gómez-Vela, F. Computational methods for gene regulatory networks reconstruction and analysis: a review. Artif. Intell. Med. 95, 133–145 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vijesh, N., Chakrabarti, S. K. & Sreekumar, J. Modeling of gene regulatory networks: a review. JBiSE 6, 223–231 (2013).
Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. M., Brooks, M. D., Swift, J. & Coruzzi, G. M. Time-based systems biology approaches to capture and model dynamic gene regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 105–131 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bechtold, U. et al. Time-series transcriptomics reveals that AGAMOUS-LIKE22 affects primary metabolism and developmental processes in drought-stressed Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 345–366 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gao, H. et al. Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16337–16342 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rong, W. et al. The ERF transcription factor TaERF3 promotes tolerance to salt and drought stresses in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 468–479 (2014).
Google Scholar
Clough, E. & Barrett, T. The Gene Expression Omnibus database. Methods Mol. Biol. 1418, 93–110 (2016).
Google Scholar
Banf, M. & Rhee, S. Y. Computational inference of gene regulatory networks: approaches, limitations and opportunities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1860, 41–52 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gupta, O. P. et al. From gene to biomolecular networks: a review of evidences for understanding complex biological function in plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 74, 66–74 (2022).
Google Scholar
Araújo, I. S. et al. Stochastic gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 8, 2132 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mercatelli, D., Scalambra, L., Triboli, L., Ray, F. & Giorgi, F. M. Gene regulatory network inference resources: a practical overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1863, 194430 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kulkarni, S. R. & Vandepoele, K. Inference of plant gene regulatory networks using data-driven methods: a practical overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1863, 194447 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E. & Guthke, R. Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic models—a review. BioSystems 96, 86–103 (2009).
Google Scholar
Qian, Y. & Huang, S. C. Improving plant gene regulatory network inference by integrative analysis of multi-omics and high resolution datasets. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 22, 8–15 (2020).
Google Scholar
Akers, K. & Murali, T. M. Gene regulatory network inference in single cell biology. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 26, 87–97 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yuan, Q. & Duren, Z. Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell multiome data using atlas-scale external data. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 247–257 (2025).
Google Scholar
Marku, M. & Pancaldi, V. From time-series transcriptomics to gene regulatory networks: a review on inference methods. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011254 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, M., He, W., Tang, J., Zou, Q. & Guo, F. A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbab009 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pušnik, Ž., Mraz, M., Zimic, N. & Moškon, M. Review and assessment of Boolean approaches for inference of gene regulatory networks. Heliyon 8, e10222 (2022).
Google Scholar
Perrin, B.-E. et al. Gene networks inference using dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 19, ii138–ii148 (2003).
Google Scholar
Mombaerts, L. et al. Dynamical differential expression (DyDE) reveals the period control mechanisms of the Arabidopsis circadian oscillator. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006674 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lu, J. et al. Causal network inference from gene transcriptional time-series response to glucocorticoids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008223 (2021).
Google Scholar
Seeger, M. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Int. J. Neural Syst. 14, 69–106 (2004).
Google Scholar
Huynh-Thu, V. A. & Geurts, P. dynGENIE3: dynamical GENIE3 for the inference of gene networks from time series expression data. Sci. Rep. 8, 3384 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rubiolo, M., Milone, D. H. & Stegmayer, G. Extreme learning machines for reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks from expression time series. Bioinformatics 34, 1253–1260 (2018).
Google Scholar
Talukder, A., Barham, C., Li, X. & Hu, H. Interpretation of deep learning in genomics and epigenomics. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa17 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hoang, N. V., Park, C., Kamran, M. & Lee, J.-Y. Gene regulatory network guided investigations and engineering of storage root development in root crops. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 762 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ikeuchi, M. et al. A gene regulatory network for cellular reprogramming in plant regeneration. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 765–777 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pajoro, A. et al. The (r)evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling Arabidopsis plant reproduction: a two-decade history. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4731–4745 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tripathi, R. K. & Wilkins, O. Single cell gene regulatory networks in plants: opportunities for enhancing climate change stress resilience. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 2006–2017 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jones, D. M. & Vandepoele, K. Identification and evolution of gene regulatory networks: insights from comparative studies in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 54, 42–48 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nolan, T. M. et al. Brassinosteroid gene regulatory networks at cellular resolution in the Arabidopsis root. Science 379, eadf4721 (2023).
Google Scholar
Redekar, N., Pilot, G., Raboy, V., Li, S. & Saghai Maroof, M. A. Inference of transcription regulatory network in low phytic acid soybean seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2029 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pink, H. et al. Identification of Lactuca sativa transcription factors impacting resistance to Botrytis cinerea through predictive network inference. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.549542 (2023).
Krouk, G., Lingeman, J., Colon, A. M., Coruzzi, G. & Shasha, D. Gene regulatory networks in plants: learning causality from time and perturbation. Genome Biol. 14, 123 (2013).
Google Scholar
Muhammad, D., Schmittling, S., Williams, C. & Long, T. A. More than meets the eye: emergent properties of transcription factors networks in Arabidopsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1860, 64–74 (2017).
Google Scholar
Varala, K. et al. Temporal transcriptional logic of dynamic regulatory networks underlying nitrogen signaling and use in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6494–6499 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhou, P. et al. Meta gene regulatory networks in maize highlight functionally relevant regulatory interactions. Plant Cell 32, 1377–1396 (2020).
Google Scholar
Müller, L. M. et al. Differential effects of day/night cues and the circadian clock on the barley transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 183, 765–779 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wilkins, O. et al. Egrins (environmental gene regulatory influence networks) in rice that function in the response to water deficit, high temperature, and agricultural environments. Plant Cell 28, 2365–2384 (2016).
Google Scholar
Reynoso, M. A. et al. Gene regulatory networks shape developmental plasticity of root cell types under water extremes in rice. Dev. Cell 57, 1177–1192 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aalto, A., Viitasaari, L., Ilmonen, P., Mombaerts, L. & Gonçalves, J. Gene regulatory network inference from sparsely sampled noisy data. Nat. Commun. 11, 3493 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ko, D. K. & Brandizzi, F. Network-based approaches for understanding gene regulation and function in plants. Plant J. 104, 302–317 (2020).
Google Scholar
Subbaroyan, A., Sil, P., Martin, O. C. & Samal, A. Leveraging developmental landscapes for model selection in Boolean gene regulatory networks. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad160 (2023).
Google Scholar
Balcerowicz, M. et al. An early-morning gene network controlled by phytochromes and cryptochromes regulates photomorphogenesis pathways in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 14, 983–996 (2021).
Google Scholar
Henriet, C. et al. Proteomics of developing pea seeds reveals a complex antioxidant network underlying the response to sulfur deficiency and water stress. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 2611–2626 (2021).
Google Scholar
Depuydt, T., De Rybel, B. & Vandepoele, K. Charting plant gene functions in the multi-omics and single-cell era. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 283–296 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cavill, R., Jennen, D., Kleinjans, J. & Briedé, J. J. Transcriptomic and metabolomic data integration. Brief. Bioinform. 17, 891–901 (2016).
Google Scholar
Agamah, F. E. et al. Computational approaches for network-based integrative multi-omics analysis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 967205 (2022).
Google Scholar
Clark, N. M. et al. Integrated omics networks reveal the temporal signaling events of brassinosteroid response in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 12, 5858 (2021).
Google Scholar
Montes, C. et al. Integration of multi-omics data reveals interplay between brassinosteroid and target of rapamycin complex signaling in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 236, 893–910 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, W. et al. A translatome–transcriptome multi-omics gene regulatory network reveals the complicated functional landscape of maize. Genome Biol. 24, 60 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, S. et al. PPGR: a comprehensive perennial plant genomes and regulation database. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1588–D1596 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kang, H. et al. TCOD: an integrated resource for tropical crops. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1651–D1660 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lan, Y. et al. AtMAD: Arabidopsis thaliana multi-omics association database. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1445–D1451 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z. et al. BnIR: a multi-omics database with various tools for Brassica napus research and breeding. Mol. Plant 16, 775–789 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Single-cell multi-omics in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1031–1041 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alemu, A. et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: key factors shaping two decades of progress. Mol. Plant 17, 552–578 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schrag, T. A. et al. Beyond genomic prediction: combining different types of omics data can improve prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Genetics 208, 1373–1385 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu, P.-Y. et al. Improvement of prediction ability by integrating multi-omic datasets in barley. BMC Genomics 23, 200 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hu, X., Xie, W., Wu, C. & Xu, S. A directed learning strategy integrating multiple omic data improves genomic prediction. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 2011–2020 (2019).
Google Scholar
Knoch, D. et al. Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 1147–1165 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hu, H. et al. Multi-omics prediction of oat agronomic and seed nutritional traits across environments and in distantly related populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 4043–4054 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, K. et al. DNNGP, a deep neural network-based method for genomic prediction using multi-omics data in plants. Mol. Plant 16, 279–293 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bhat, J. A. et al. Genomic selection in the era of next generation sequencing for complex traits in plant breeding. Front. Genet. 7, 221 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hasan, N., Choudhary, S., Naaz, N., Sharma, N. & Laskar, R. A. Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 19, 128 (2021).
Google Scholar
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lozano, R. et al. Comparative evolutionary genetics of deleterious load in sorghum and maize. Nat. Plants 7, 17–24 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Divergence in the ABA gene regulatory network underlies differential growth control. Nat. Plants 8, 549–560 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lü, P. et al. Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat. Plants 4, 784–791 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hickman, R. et al. Architecture and dynamics of the jasmonic acid gene regulatory network. Plant Cell 29, 2086–2105 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jamali, S. H., Cockram, J. & Hickey, L. T. Is plant variety registration keeping pace with speed breeding techniques? Euphytica 216, 131 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wada, N., Ueta, R., Osakabe, Y. & Osakabe, K. Precision genome editing in plants: state-of-the-art in CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 234 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, B., Sun, C., Li, J. & Gao, C. Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 603–622 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mishra, R., Joshi, R. K. & Zhao, K. Base editing in crops: current advances, limitations and future implications. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 20–31 (2020).
Google Scholar
Molla, K. A., Sretenovic, S., Bansal, K. C. & Qi, Y. Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors. Nat. Plants 7, 1166–1187 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Plant base editing and prime editing: the current status and future perspectives. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 444–467 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pan, C., Sretenovic, S. & Qi, Y. CRISPR/dCas-mediated transcriptional and epigenetic regulation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 60, 101980 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jogam, P. et al. A review on CRISPR/Cas-based epigenetic regulation in plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 219, 1261–1271 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Expanding the scope of plant genome engineering with Cas12a orthologs and highly multiplexable editing systems. Nat. Commun. 12, 1944 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kavuri, N. R., Ramasamy, M., Qi, Y. & Mandadi, K. Applications of CRISPR/Cas13-based RNA editing in plants. Cells 11, 2665 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wada, N., Osakabe, K. & Osakabe, Y. Expanding the plant genome editing toolbox with recently developed CRISPR–Cas systems. Plant Physiol. 188, 1825–1837 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cassan, O. et al. A gene regulatory network in Arabidopsis roots reveals features and regulators of the plant response to elevated CO2. New Phytol. 239, 992–1004 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. et al. Decoding the gene regulatory network of endosperm differentiation in maize. Nat. Commun. 15, 34 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Rice co-expression network analysis identifies gene modules associated with agronomic traits. Plant Physiol. 190, 1526–1542 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. A new rice breeding method: CRISPR/Cas9 system editing of the Xa13 promoter to cultivate transgene-free bacterial blight-resistant rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 313–315 (2020).
Google Scholar
Peng, A. et al. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1509–1519 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, J. et al. Efficient protein tagging and cis-regulatory element engineering via precise and directional oligonucleotide-based targeted insertion in plants. Plant Cell 35, 2722–2735 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dong, O. X. & Ronald, P. C. Targeted DNA insertion in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2004834117 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dong, O. X. et al. Marker-free carotenoid-enriched rice generated through targeted gene insertion using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Commun. 11, 1178 (2020).
Google Scholar
Claeys, H. et al. Coordinated gene upregulation in maize through CRISPR/Cas-mediated enhancer insertion. Plant Biotechnol. J. 22, 16–18 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, C. et al. Precise integration of large DNA sequences in plant genomes using PrimeRoot editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 316–327 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vazquez-Vilar, M., Selma, S. & Orzaez, D. The design of synthetic gene circuits in plants: new components, old challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 3791–3805 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brophy, J. A. N. et al. Synthetic genetic circuits as a means of reprogramming plant roots. Science 377, 747–751 (2022).
Google Scholar
Khan, M. A. et al. CRISPRi-based circuits to control gene expression in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 416–430 (2025).
Google Scholar
Staub, J. E., Serquen, F. C. & Gupta, M. Genetic markers, map construction, and their application in plant breeding. HortScience 31, 729–741 (1996).
Google Scholar
Pérez-de-Castro, A. M. et al. Application of genomic tools in plant breeding. Curr. Genomics 13, 179–195 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chung, Y. S., Choi, S. C., Jun, T.-H. & Kim, C. Genotyping-by-sequencing: a promising tool for plant genetics research and breeding. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 58, 425–431 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. QTG-seq accelerates QTL fine mapping through QTL partitioning and whole-genome sequencing of bulked segregant samples. Mol. Plant 12, 426–437 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jamil, I. N. et al. Systematic multi-omics integration (MOI) approach in plant systems biology. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 944 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mounet, F. et al. Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development. Plant Physiol. 149, 1505–1528 (2009).
Google Scholar
Larriba, E., Nicolás-Albujer, M., Sánchez-García, A. B. & Pérez-Pérez, J. M. Identification of transcriptional networks involved in de novo organ formation in tomato hypocotyl explants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 16112 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sacco, A., Raiola, A., Calafiore, R., Barone, A. & Rigano, M. M. New insights in the control of antioxidants accumulation in tomato by transcriptomic analyses of genotypes exhibiting contrasting levels of fruit metabolites. BMC Genomics 20, 43 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hale, B. et al. Gene regulatory network inference in soybean upon infection by Phytophthora sojae. PLoS ONE 18, e0287590 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pradeepkumara, N. et al. Fruit transcriptional profiling of the contrasting genotypes for shelf life reveals the key candidate genes and molecular pathways regulating post-harvest biology in cucumber. Genomics 114, 110273 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jaiswal, S. et al. Transcriptomic signature of drought response in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) and development of web-genomic resources. Sci. Rep. 8, 3382 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yi, F., Huo, M., Li, J. & Yu, J. Time-series transcriptomics reveals a drought-responsive temporal network and crosstalk between drought stress and the circadian clock in foxtail millet. Plant J. 110, 1213–1228 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kaur, B. et al. Omics for the improvement of abiotic, biotic, and agronomic traits in major cereal crops: applications, challenges, and prospects. Plants 10, 1989 (2021).
Google Scholar
De Clercq, I. et al. Integrative inference of transcriptional networks in Arabidopsis yields novel ROS signalling regulators. Nat. Plants 7, 500–513 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. A wheat integrative regulatory network from large-scale complementary functional datasets enables trait-associated gene discovery for crop improvement. Mol. Plant 16, 393–414 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wei, X. et al. Genomic investigation of 18,421 lines reveals the genetic architecture of rice. Science 385, eadm8762 (2024).
Google Scholar
Munns, R. & Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681 (2008).
Google Scholar
Shrivastava, P. & Kumar, R. Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22, 123–131 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ruz, G. A., Timmermann, T. & Goles, E. Reconstruction of a GRN model of salt stress response in Arabidopsis using genetic algorithms. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 1–8 (2015).
Hu, J. et al. Time-series transcriptome comparison reveals the gene regulation network under salt stress in soybean (Glycine max) roots. BMC Plant Biol. 22, 157 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, R. et al. Comparative analysis of salt responsive gene regulatory networks in rice and Arabidopsis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 85, 107188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, B. et al. The transcriptional regulatory network of hormones and genes under salt stress in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1115593 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hu, W., Ren, Q., Chen, Y., Xu, G. & Qian, Y. Genome-wide identification and analysis of WRKY gene family in maize provide insights into regulatory network in response to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 21, 427 (2021).
Google Scholar
Song, L. et al. A transcription factor hierarchy defines an environmental stress response network. Science 354, aag1550 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ecker, J. & Song, L. Environmental stress response transcriptional regulatory network. US patent 20,180,112,228 (2018).
Tian, H. et al. A novel family of transcription factors conserved in angiosperms is required for ABA signalling. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 2958–2971 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. Knockout of the entire family of AITR genes in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced drought and salinity tolerance without fitness costs. BMC Plant Biol. 21, 137 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of NTAITRs, a family of transcription repressor genes, leads to enhanced drought tolerance in tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 15268 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. et al. Mutation of GmAITR genes by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing results in enhanced salinity stress tolerance in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 779598 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. et al. Evolution of AITR family genes in cotton and their functions in abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Biol. 23, 58–68 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gao, Y. et al. Diversity and redundancy of the ripening regulatory networks revealed by the fruitENCODE and the new CRISPR/Cas9 CNR and NOR mutants. Hortic. Res. 6, 39 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cai, J. et al. FvMYB79 positively regulates strawberry fruit softening via transcriptional activation of FvPME38. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 101 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lakhwani, D. et al. Genome wide identification of MADS box gene family in Musa balbisiana and their divergence during evolution. Gene 836, 146666 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nobori, T. et al. A rare PRIMER cell state in plant immunity. Nature 638, 197–205 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lee, T. A. et al. A single-nucleus atlas of seed-to-seed development in Arabidopsis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.533992 (2023).
Swift, J. et al. Exaptation of ancestral cell-identity networks enables C4 photosynthesis. Nature 636, 143–150 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ferrari, C., Manosalva Pérez, N. & Vandepoele, K. MINI-EX: integrative inference of single-cell gene regulatory networks in plants. Mol. Plant 15, 1807–1824 (2022).
Google Scholar
Philips, T. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): transgenic crops and recombinant DNA technology. Nat. Educ. 1, 213 (2008).
Bawa, A. S. & Anilakumar, K. R. Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns—a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50, 1035–1046 (2013).
Google Scholar
Friedrichs, S. et al. Meeting report of the OECD conference on ‘Genome Editing: Applications in Agriculture—Implications for Health, Environment and Regulation’. Transgenic Res. 28, 419–463 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tian, Z., Wang, J.-W., Li, J. & Han, B. Designing future crops: challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. Plant J. 105, 1165–1178 (2021).
Google Scholar
Turnbull, C., Lillemo, M. & Hvoslef-Eide, T. A. K. Global regulation of genetically modified crops amid the gene edited crop boom — a review. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 630396 (2021).
Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2023/0226(COD) — 24/04/2024 — Plants Obtained by Certain New Genomic Techniques and Their Food and Feed www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240202IPR17320/new-genomic-techniques-meps-back-rules-to-support-green-transition-of-farmers (2024).
Mehta, D. EU proposal on CRISPR-edited crops is welcome — but not enough. Nature 619, 437 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vanderschuren, H., Chatukuta, P., Weigel, D. & Mehta, D. A new chance for genome editing in Europe. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1378–1380 (2023).
Google Scholar
