Should a ‘Florida Springs National Park’ be created? Environmental advocates are torn

The proposal of a member of the Florida Congress to sew a patchwork of sources in the North and the Center of Florida in the 64th National Park in the country will not help to protect defenders from the exceptional and crucial fresh water resources, according to lawyers.

The US representative Randy Fine to the Florida Springs National Park Act would order the federal government to conduct a study on how to do the springs located on 2,800 miles of land in a national park. The land encompassing the different springs is south of Jacksonville, north of Orlando and east of Gainesville and includes the Ocala National Forest, the Lower Wekiva river park and the Rock Springs park which extends over the counties of Orange, Lac and Seminole.

“We are the Yellowstone of Springs,” said Fine, R-Melbourne Beach, at a press conference at the Ocala National Forest on August 25. “It is imperative that we developed in a sustainable way and does not ruin what Florida has.”

His bill calls for Florida’s sources “as miraculous as any other national asset that we have in this country”.

Fine said that he had visited all the national parks, including Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, but that he was still breathtaking by Florida Springs.

“When my children were born … I decided that I would take them to all the national parks of the United States,” said fine. “Barely a few months ago … I visited the springs and I thought:” Why are they not protected? “”

Although the main conservation defenders say that the study would add precious research, some doubted a designation of the national park – which could massively increase visits and traffic – would ultimately help the main problems threatening natural wonders.

More than 1,000 Florida sources – the largest concentration of freshwater sources in the world – are threatened by development, agricultural pollution and climate change. The health of the springs is vital because they are directly linked to 90% of the drinking water from the state.

“The modification of state parks or state forests in national forests or national parks does none of the things that must be done to really restore the springs,” said Ryan Smart, executive director of the non -profit council of Florida Springs, who advocates the protection and preservation of Springs on a state scale. “The evil that arrives at springs is due to land uses on private property around springs.”

Reducing pollution, getting rid of septic tanks nearby and limiting consumer use permits, or the regulated quantity of water authorized to be taken from Florida aquifer, are all important actions to help restore the springs, said Smart. None of these actions are in the bill.

“It’s not that we don’t need additional protections, it’s just that it doesn’t provide,” said smart. “All means to protect the springs are regulated at the state level.”

Smart has said that the federal government could help by providing funding for these projects, but that it is not linked to the creation of a national park.

Fine argued that the main objective of the bill was to protect the springs. But with the recent adoption of the State Park Preservation Act, signed in May by Governor Ron Desantis, he can make the designation federal, said Smart.

The law protects the 175 state state parks against development and reported the controversial state plan to build golf courses, luxury lodges, pickleball and tennis courts in three state parks.

“At this point, I think it is sure to say that our state parks are as well protected as our national parks,” said Smart. “And we have much more to say what is happening at the level of the state than the federal level.”

As part of President Donald Trump’s administration, the National Park Service is in crisis as the Government Ministry of Effectiveness, or “Doge”, the budget cuts led to the loss of almost a quarter of its employees.

Despite an order of the court to rehthe many of those who are dismissed, the staff are still not return to normal.

Smart said that the contrast between state bipartite efforts to ensure that parks are protected and that the actions of the federal government are “worrying”.

“He worries me that we take something that [belongs to] The citizens of Florida … and we would abandon them at another level of government that we will have less saying or contribution, “said Smart.” Things change at the federal level. “”

But Julie Wraithmell, vice-president and executive director of Audubon Florida, said that the proposal was not so bad.

The study, she said, is “really important, because it will assess the feasibility, will identify all the potential involuntary consequences and, hope, will explore the greatest opportunities to improve the conservation of our sources,” said Wraithmell. “The member of the Fine Congress has inspired a new life in the discussion of the way in which the Florida’s world class springs are absolutely.”

A change in state management to the federalum can limit swimming to the sources and the costs that visitors pay can change, Wreithmell said. But overall, she said, a visitor to the state park and a visitor to the national park do not notice the change.

The bill was presented to the House in July and assigned to the Chamber’s Natural Resources Committee, where legislators will hold hearings and revise it before transmitting it to the full chamber for a vote. If he succeeds in passing the room, the Senate will start a similar process, then sent to Trump for his approval or his veto.

If it becomes law, the interior department has three years to complete the study and assess whether the designated area contains significant resources at the national level and report its results.

2025 Orlando Sentinel. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.