https://www.profitableratecpm.com/f4ffsdxe?key=39b1ebce72f3758345b2155c98e6709c
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Justice Department would release only some Epstein files on Friday, a move that members of Congress called a violation of the law signed by President Trump last month.
Trump has also repeatedly used these records as a weapon to try to harm prominent Democrats. Preparing their publication, eagerly awaited by both journalists and the public, with documents that harm its enemies would be part of this strategy.
Blanche signals that the administration intends to wage a war of attrition, throwing out thousands of documents at a time to make it difficult to determine context and identify missing pieces. This raises the prospect of media and online personalities competing to publish new details, favoring speed over rigor.
The files come from an untrustworthy source and will inevitably trigger a feeding frenzy. The fact that the Trump administration is using its discretion – and breaking the law – to divide the files into multiple tranches only increases the chances that the documents will be deployed strategically.
The risk that the Trump administration would manipulate its reluctant release of the records was already high; he has previously presented public information as new material, promised to release records voluntarily before backtracking, and, in the case of Attorney General Pam Bondi, declared that an Epstein “client list” did not exist after claiming it was on his desk.
Trump has also repeatedly used these records as a weapon to try to harm prominent Democrats. Preparing their publication, eagerly awaited by both journalists and the public, with documents that harm its enemies would be part of this strategy.
Blanche signals that the administration intends to wage a war of attrition, throwing out thousands of documents at a time to make it difficult to determine context and identify missing pieces. This raises the prospect of media and online personalities competing to publish new details, favoring speed over rigor.
The files come from an untrustworthy source and will inevitably trigger a feeding frenzy. The fact that the Trump administration is using its discretion – and breaking the law – to divide the files into multiple tranches only increases the chances that the documents will be deployed strategically.
“My God, what’s in the Epstein files?” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) tweeted. “Release all records. It’s literally the law.”
The risk that the Trump administration would manipulate its reluctant release of the records was already high; he has previously presented public information as new material, promised to release records voluntarily before backtracking, and, in the case of Attorney General Pam Bondi, declared that an Epstein “client list” did not exist after claiming it was on his desk.
Trump has also repeatedly used these records as a weapon to try to harm prominent Democrats. Preparing their publication, eagerly awaited by both journalists and the public, with documents that harm its enemies would be part of this strategy.
Blanche signals that the administration intends to wage a war of attrition, throwing out thousands of documents at a time to make it difficult to determine context and identify missing pieces. This raises the prospect of media and online personalities competing to publish new details, favoring speed over rigor.
The files come from an untrustworthy source and will inevitably trigger a feeding frenzy. The fact that the Trump administration is using its discretion – and breaking the law – to divide the files into multiple tranches only increases the chances that the documents will be deployed strategically.
House Oversight Ranking Members Robert Garcia (D-CA) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) made similar sabre-rattling Friday, saying in a statement: “We are now reviewing all legal options in the face of this violation of federal law. »
“My God, what’s in the Epstein files?” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) tweeted. “Release all records. It’s literally the law.”
The risk that the Trump administration would manipulate its reluctant release of the records was already high; he has previously presented public information as new material, promised to release records voluntarily before backtracking, and, in the case of Attorney General Pam Bondi, declared that an Epstein “client list” did not exist after claiming it was on his desk.
Trump has also repeatedly used these records as a weapon to try to harm prominent Democrats. Preparing their publication, eagerly awaited by both journalists and the public, with documents that harm its enemies would be part of this strategy.
Blanche signals that the administration intends to wage a war of attrition, throwing out thousands of documents at a time to make it difficult to determine context and identify missing pieces. This raises the prospect of media and online personalities competing to publish new details, favoring speed over rigor.
The files come from an untrustworthy source and will inevitably trigger a feeding frenzy. The fact that the Trump administration is using its discretion – and breaking the law – to divide the files into multiple tranches only increases the chances that the documents will be deployed strategically.
“Any Justice Department official who fails to comply with this law will be subject to prosecution for obstruction of justice,” Khanna said in a speech on the House floor this week. “If Pam Bondi fails to follow the law, she will either be held in contempt of Congress or subject to impeachment.”
House Oversight Ranking Members Robert Garcia (D-CA) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) made similar sabre-rattling Friday, saying in a statement: “We are now reviewing all legal options in the face of this violation of federal law. »
“My God, what’s in the Epstein files?” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) tweeted. “Release all records. It’s literally the law.”
The risk that the Trump administration would manipulate its reluctant release of the records was already high; he has previously presented public information as new material, promised to release records voluntarily before backtracking, and, in the case of Attorney General Pam Bondi, declared that an Epstein “client list” did not exist after claiming it was on his desk.
Trump has also repeatedly used these records as a weapon to try to harm prominent Democrats. Preparing their publication, eagerly awaited by both journalists and the public, with documents that harm its enemies would be part of this strategy.
Blanche signals that the administration intends to wage a war of attrition, throwing out thousands of documents at a time to make it difficult to determine context and identify missing pieces. This raises the prospect of media and online personalities competing to publish new details, favoring speed over rigor.
The files come from an untrustworthy source and will inevitably trigger a feeding frenzy. The fact that the Trump administration is using its discretion – and breaking the law – to divide the files into multiple tranches only increases the chances that the documents will be deployed strategically.
In a captionless tweet, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), who led the effort to release the files with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), highlighted the portion of the Epstein File Transparency Act (signed Nov. 19) that requires the release of the files “no later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this law.”
“Any Justice Department official who fails to comply with this law will be subject to prosecution for obstruction of justice,” Khanna said in a speech on the House floor this week. “If Pam Bondi fails to follow the law, she will either be held in contempt of Congress or subject to impeachment.”
House Oversight Ranking Members Robert Garcia (D-CA) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) made similar sabre-rattling Friday, saying in a statement: “We are now reviewing all legal options in the face of this violation of federal law. »
“My God, what’s in the Epstein files?” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) tweeted. “Release all records. It’s literally the law.”
The risk that the Trump administration would manipulate its reluctant release of the records was already high; he has previously presented public information as new material, promised to release records voluntarily before backtracking, and, in the case of Attorney General Pam Bondi, declared that an Epstein “client list” did not exist after claiming it was on his desk.
Trump has also repeatedly used these records as a weapon to try to harm prominent Democrats. Preparing their publication, eagerly awaited by both journalists and the public, with documents that harm its enemies would be part of this strategy.
Blanche signals that the administration intends to wage a war of attrition, throwing out thousands of documents at a time to make it difficult to determine context and identify missing pieces. This raises the prospect of media and online personalities competing to publish new details, favoring speed over rigor.
The files come from an untrustworthy source and will inevitably trigger a feeding frenzy. The fact that the Trump administration is using its discretion – and breaking the law – to divide the files into multiple tranches only increases the chances that the documents will be deployed strategically.
