Apple Sues the YouTuber Who Leaked iOS 26

Leaks are a A constant part of the major product news cycles, especially for companies like Apple. Online checks like Jon Prosser and Mark Gurman de Bloomberg have long predicted the content of the upcoming Apple announcements, quoting anonymous sources from the company to the next. They were right often enough to become a real pain for the Cupertino company.

Now Apple has taken the opportunity to retaliate against leaks. In a complaint filed Thursday before the American Federal Court for the Northern District of California, Apple accuses the eminent flight Jon Prosser of allegedly stipulating “penetrating into an iPhone of Apple development, steal from Apple’s commercial secrets and enjoy the flight”.

The costume alleys that, with a cocoonspirator, prosser, which makes videos on the Front page tech YouTube channel, deliberately took advantage of an Apple employee named Ethan Lipnik. Develop the phone and show the details of the unprecedented software to prosser on a video call. Prosser would then have used information obtained at the start of this glance on iOS in videos he published on his YouTube channel long before Apple officially announced updates.

The trial also alleges that Ramacaciotti claims that Prosser organized the whole plan, promising Ramacciotti that he “will discover a means for [Mr. Ramacciotti] To obtain payment. “”

Prosser denied any reprehensible act and says that the details of the prosecution are incorrect. In public articles on X, Prosser argued that it was not that things happened on his side.

“The details that Apple was given is simply not correct,” wrote Prosser via a direct message on X. “I did not know how the information was obtained. He never told me that he” needed money “and I absolutely did not ask him to play this.”

Prosser does not deny having revealed the information gleaned from Ramacciotti. He highlighted the details of the unprecedented update in a series of videos earlier this year, one in which he called the news, “the biggest iOS leak of all time”.

Despite the question of how he really acquired the information, the consequences were messy. Ethan Lipnik, the Apple employee who had the development phone that Ramacciotti would have accessed, was dismissed by the company. According to the complaint, Apple has ended the employment of Lipnik “for not having followed Apple policies designed to protect its confidential information, including development devices and unpublished software and features”.

Apple did not respond to requests for comments. Ethan Lipnik also did not respond to a request for comments.

“This is a fairly important trial,” explains Anshel Sag, principal analyst of the technological research company Moor Insights & Strategy, in an email. “But I also believe that there is a great disparity between what Prosser says and what Apple lightens, especially since the employee seemed not to be aware of what was going on.”

The biggest problem being alleged here, says SAG, is that even if the data was taken from a development device that should have been better protected, how this data was acquired and where they came should have been verified before the details were extinct in the world.

“In the end, each company fights leaks, in particular Apple, but with this entirely in the United States, society has much more power and laws to support its efforts,” explains Sag. Many apple leaks come historically from sources outside the United States, such as its manufacturing and supply chain partners in Asia. Since the complaint focuses on the events that would have taken place in California, Apple can support before the Federal Court that two American laws – the law on trade secrets and the law on fraud and mistreatment of computer science – have been raped.

Prosser says that he did not even discover the trial before reading a story of macrumors on the file.

“I feel horrible that ethan ended on this subject,” explains Prosser. “I want him to share with Apple what had happened and I want Apple to connect with me for more answers – I would have likely to be discussed with them.”