Fox News Cuts Away From Trump to Cover Taylor Swift Engagement

“Indeed, in recent months, the main officers of the executive (and their spokespersons) described the federal judges of the district across the country as” activists “,” activists “,” radical “,” in politically “,` `thug”, “unleashed”, “scandalous”, too extinct, “unleashed” [and] Unconstitutional, “C]fled”, and worse “, wrote Cullen.” Although certain tensions between the government’s coordinates are a characteristic of our constitutional system, this concerted effort of the executive to dirty and impute the individual judges which pronounce against this is both unprecedented and unhappy. »»

Cullen wrote that there was “no other alternative than to reject” the government’s trial.

“Containing otherwise the opposite to a crushing precedent, would distance you from the long -standing constitutional tradition and would offer the rule of law,” wrote the judge. “All this does not mean that the executive is without any recourse; far from it. If the executive really believes that the permanent orders of the defendants violate the law, it should take advantage of the recourse proven at the disposal of all the federal litigants: it should appeal.”