Orico OS5 review: A mid-range PCIe 4.0 SSD with a beefy heatsink

Best prices today: Orico OS5 PCIe 4.0 SSD

$ 71.99

$ 79.99

The SSD OS5 NVME D’ORICO is a spectator thanks to its elegant and strong thermal dissipator. It is moderately fast for its fellow men and will work well, if not optimally in the PS5 for which it is marketed. This gaming console does not support the Host memory tampon technology (HMB) that the OS5 uses for the primary chatting service on a PC.

Read the rest to find out more, then see our overview of the best SSDs for the comparison.

What are the features of ORICO OS5?

You will notice on the photo at the head of the article that the OS5 is delivered with a rather heavy thermal sink to adapt to its 2280 shape (22 mm wide, 80 mm long). It is a PCIe 4.0 SSD, NVME using a host of host memory (HMB) for primary cache instead of DRAM.

The OS5 controller is a maxio 1602A and its NAND is TLC of 144 layers (cell with triple level / 3 bit). Apparently, around 35% of this can be dedicated to the secondary cache (Orico claims 20%), that is to say by writing the NAND as SLC to a single bit (cell at a level).

Orico guarantees the OS5 for five years, which is attenuated by a 600 TBW (teraoctets which can be written before reading alone) by capacity teraoctet. It is almost average for the industry and TLC of 144 layers.

If you ever want to know how close you are to your TBW limit, download Crystaldinfo or a similar utility and check the “percentage used” number. As it only increases with the Scriptures, it will probably be much less than you imagine. My last main computer was only 1% after two years, but with intensive use of external storage for many tasks.

How much does the ORICO OS5 cost?

The OS5 is $ 90 in capacity 1 TB, $ 150 for 2 TB and $ 280 for 4 TB (prices on Amazon are about $ 20 less than that). It is a bit of capacity at a reasonable price since the thermal disipote included is generally an option from $ 10 to $ 15 with most SSDs. I would not call OS5 a good deal, but it is certainly competitive.

What is the speed of the ORICO OS5?

Using our new MO test and the equipment, the OS5 has shot in the fourth PCIe 4.0 / HMB score as fast on six SSDs. Not great, although the difference is not vast in most tasks, as you will see below. The result is that the SSD NVMEs even slower are really very fast.

The OS5 that we tested was injured by the fact that it represents only 1 TB and that almost all the SSDs that we test are 2 TB or 4 TB. For this reason, it lacked secondary cache faster. It really wreaked havoc in the writing of 450 GB.

But the OS5 was certainly competitive in Crystaldiskmark 8, including sequential transfer tests illustrated below.

The 4K numbers of Crystalsiskmark 8 were roughly the same story. Barely great, but good enough for the government’s work.

During the way it is only 48 GB, the ORICO OS5 was largely tied with the Lexar 2280 Play most spacious (another Heatsed / HMB design marketed for the PS5), Teamgroup MP44Q and WD Blue SN5100. Faster in some cases, a little slower in others.

Note that Fastcopy is a highly recommended file transfer utility that works much closer to the rhythm you see in the synthetic benchmarks than Windows Explorer.

The writing of 450 GB is the place where the OS5 was at the proclaim of its competitors. The result of the lower capacity and the lack of secondary cache already discussed. However…

… The long news of writing is not so bad. Once the secondary cache has been exhausted, the TLC always transcribes data to cells at a living pace of around 1 Gbit / s. Believe me, I saw worse. How about 75 Mbps at the start of QLC?

Should you buy the ORICO OS5?

Although it is not optimal for the PS5, like the other HMB conceptions, the OS5 will make the work adequately and for much less than a dram model. I like the appearance of the thermal dissipator, so if you find the right price, have you.

But to be honest, to slap a thermal dissipator on HMB, then market the SSD as ideal for the PS5 is not my favorite schtick marketing. This applies to Orico, but also Lexar with its Play 2280 series.

How we test

The reader tests currently use Windows 11 24h2, 64 bit in progress of a Samsung 990 Pro PCIe 4.0 in a motherboard Asus Z890-Creator (PCIE 4.0 / 5.0). The CPU is a Core Ultra i5 225 diet / supplied by two crucial modules of 64 GB DDR5 4800 MHz (128 GB of total memory).

The 20 Gbit / s USB and Thunderbolt 5 are integrated and the Intel CPU / GPU graphics are used. The PCIe 5.0 internal SSDs involved in the tests are mounted on an ASUS hyper M.2 X16 Gen5 ACPTER CARD.

We execute the Crystaldiskmark 8.04 (and 9), as SSD 2, and synthetic benchmarks Atto 4 (to maintain the length of the article, we only report) to find the potential performance of the storage device, then a series of 48 GB and 450 GB of Windows Transfers Explorer Windows Explorer to show what users will see the users Routine copy, as well as the Far Faster Fastcopity Far Fastcopy to show what is possible.

A raid 0 to two SSD table of 20 Gbit / s on the ASUS Hyper M.2 X16 Gen5 above is used as the second reader of our transfer tests. Previously, the 48 GB tests were carried out with a RAM disc.

Each test is carried out on a formatted and newly cut NTFS reader, the results are therefore optimal. Note that in normal use, as training fills up, performance can decrease due to less Nand for secondary cache, as well as other factors. This problem has somewhat resolved with the current SSD harvest using more mature controllers and a faster generation Nand.

Note that our test tests are evolving and that these results may not correspond to those of previous items. Only comparisons inside the article are 100% valid because these results are collected using current equipment and MO.